David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.
View all posts by admin
2 thoughts on “Speaking of In-Kind Contributions”
Search engine optimization (SEO) and “sponsoring” ads so they rank higher in search results is usually a paid option for the advertiser.
So what’s it worth in this case? IOW, how much would the Harris campaign have to pay for this listing preference under normal circumstances?
And why isn’t it being considered a “contribution-in-kind” donation, which must be reported to the IRS and FEC … with civil and/or criminal penalties if it’s not?
For the record, I don’t care one bit why they’re doing it, be it economic/financial or political. The “why” doesn’t matter; they are putting their thumb on the scales of public opinion just like any other advertiser, their efforts have a monetary value, and such value must be reported or there are fines and penalties.
Just imagine how the Left would be all over it if they were doing it for Trump’s campaign.
Google’s primary objective is to generate ad revenue through fear-based content, explaining, “I think whatever demographic is most fearful is going to be most profitable.” According to Leazer, the left currently represents the most fearful demographic, which is why Google has been pushing pro-Kamala narratives for profit
So according to that big of gaslighting, the left must always reprsent the most fearful demographic, because Google never features conservative-leaning content.
Search engine optimization (SEO) and “sponsoring” ads so they rank higher in search results is usually a paid option for the advertiser.
So what’s it worth in this case? IOW, how much would the Harris campaign have to pay for this listing preference under normal circumstances?
And why isn’t it being considered a “contribution-in-kind” donation, which must be reported to the IRS and FEC … with civil and/or criminal penalties if it’s not?
For the record, I don’t care one bit why they’re doing it, be it economic/financial or political. The “why” doesn’t matter; they are putting their thumb on the scales of public opinion just like any other advertiser, their efforts have a monetary value, and such value must be reported or there are fines and penalties.
Just imagine how the Left would be all over it if they were doing it for Trump’s campaign.
So according to that big of gaslighting, the left must always reprsent the most fearful demographic, because Google never features conservative-leaning content.