The lawsuit challenges Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) regulation, and County Sheriff policy, that requires an applicant for a license to sell firearms in the state agree to warrantless searches by the State Police, or their designee, to ensure compliance with state law. Furthermore, these inspections would allow regulators to seize license holders or employees for up to two hours, compel them to answer any questions posed, provide documentation, and threatens to revoke their state license to sell firearms for refusing to comply with the demands. [More]
Nobody EXPECTS the Spanish Inquisition!
At least not in the land of the Bill of Rights.
In a case that has far-reaching implications, a District Court Judge in Texas held in favor of the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and its partners, confirming that all current and future members are covered by the injunction granted in the case which prevents the enforcement of the post office carry ban at most ordinary locations. [More]
I still don’t have my question about the sign answered .
I checked the FPC site this morning, and it appears that you have to commit to a minimum of a $3 a month payment to become a member. Not even an option for a $36 single payment. People like me, on a tight Social Security budget, apparently are left out of the settlement.
First off, I don’t think FPC is the only player in this game. I’m pretty confident my GOA membership covers me.
Second, I know FPC accepts annual dues because I’ve paid them twice.