Was Humiliating Navy Rifle Photo Actually Photoshopped? [More]
If so, by whom, and why did the Navy put it up in the first place?
Others with more knowledge of such things than me (I’m a rights guy, not a hardware guy) are also pointing out disparities in rail spacing and the like.
I may look into doing a FOIA request.
It worked with the Air Force to get Sutherland Springs shooter court martial records, although I did have to sue them…
you say you are a rights guy not a hardware guy? So do you have hardware? and if so I imagine you understand the basic fundimentels of said hardware, attachments,scopes,etc.and if so you should be an expert on your own gear and such have a discerning eye.
Well,I understand enough to spell “fundamentals.”
I don’t write about hardware because that’s not my passion or my lane. I’ve carved out right where I want to be.
As for what I own, that’s already been well established.
What do you expect from the Navy?
They can’t do a simple job without turning it into an adventure.
(old one liner about a NAVY recruiting slogan.)
Some scope covers are transparent so that the shooter can use the scope quickly in an emergency.
There’s also the incident where a New York SWAT officer was pictured at a hostage incident with his EOTech sight mounted backwards.
Not saying the Navy photo wasn’t fabricated. Just saying it didn’t have to be.