A Democratic candidate vying for a House of Delegates seat is under criticism after videos were allegedly found of her performing sex acts with her husband for tips. [More]
Her “position” is clear: Mom Demands Action.
How is she taking money so paying losers can rub one out an “illegal invasion of [her] privacy designed to humiliate [her] and [her] family” and a Republican “sex crime,” and what does it say about a husband who gets off on his wife being an on-demand whore?
Hey, I thought politicians couldn’t do this:
Maybe it’s just “elected officials”? But if a candidate can stifle relevant speech, how is that not election interference?
[Via Steve T]
UPDATE
This justified a slight title change.
[Via CDT]
Elected politicians can’t gatekeep their official accounts, but they can gatekeep their personal ones. Candidates don’t have official accounts.
The old joke punchline comes to mind, “we know what you are, we’re just negotiating price now.”