Last night, I was given a statement from the victim of Tim Walz to release this morning. [More]
Vs.
Anyone blindly believing this, is retarded. [More]
I agree.
What about people who blindly discourage investigating such a serious criminal accusation leveled against a powerful politician?
It’s no secret I could not be more against Walz. I think if he and Kamala are elected it’s an existential threat to peaceable means of redress for Second Amendment advocates. With that being said, I thought Community Notes existed for just such posts as these.
I understand not dignifying a “Have you stopped beating your wife?” loaded question and helping draw attention to it. Still, this has the potential to impact election results, and if I don’t object to them doing this to Walz I can’t object to them doing this to anyone, including me.
As a proponent of “Red Flag Laws,” Walz is all for you and me having to prove OUR innocence if accused of something the government will disarm us over without being convicted of anything. But that still doesn’t make it right for anyone to demand he prove HIS innocence: The burden of proving guilt is on the state.
FEC and DOJ should be the ones investigating this. If it turns out to be a malicious lie being spread in an attempt at election interference, that’s prosecutable, especially if more than one person is involved. So is if the accusations turn out to have substance.
If you see something say something, right?
Three critical rules in the intel biz.
Who is this?
Why are they telling me this?
Why are they telling me this now?
My tinfoil hat is murmuring to me that the recent DOS of the Internet Archives (still in progress) was launched because some high-ranking Democrat has a secret that they want to make un-researchable.