A Democratic candidate vying for a House of Delegates seat is under criticism after videos were allegedly found of her performing sex acts with her husband for tips. [More]
Her “position” is clear: Mom Demands Action.
How is she taking money so paying losers can rub one out an “illegal invasion of [her] privacy designed to humiliate [her] and [her] family” and a Republican “sex crime,” and what does it say about a husband who gets off on his wife being an on-demand whore?
Hey, I thought politicians couldn’t do this:
Maybe it’s just “elected officials”? But if a candidate can stifle relevant speech, how is that not election interference?
[Via Steve T]
UPDATE
This justified a slight title change.
[Via CDT]
