The Mark of Kaine

The prideful creation presuming itself to be the Creator seems to me to be how this whole mess started.

[Via Jess]

Author: admin

David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

3 thoughts on “The Mark of Kaine”

  1. Problem: Tim Kaine, like most Leftists, has only a passing, fair-weather belief in an Almighty God. Most of the time, he believes in the almighty government, not in a God that grants us our rights.

    However, the solution is simple. The Founders don’t mention God and only mention a Creator from time to time. Instead, men (used broadly, to refer to all humans) have natural, unalienable rights by virtue of being born human. Bottom line is, even if any of us — including Tim Kaine — don’t believe in God, we still have our rights.

    1. The Founders use of the term “Creator” is normal back in the 1700’s, even reading Civil War and Old West history, 1860’s to 1890’s, they used “Creator” more than “God”. “Providence” was also a common term during the same era. All meant “God”.
      If our Republic’s Founding documents were written using God as a basis for our rights, and they were, then if this Republic loses its faith in “God”, “Creator”, “Providence”, what have you, we’ll lose whatever little attachment we have left, circa 2025, to the Founding documents of this Republic.
      So yes, people have rights, regardless of their belief or lack of belief in God, but if the electorate, or the powers that be don’t have a belief in God, you get things like abortion, trans-nonsense, the belief that government should have a monopoly on violence and so on.

  2. Quick questions for those on the Left who don’t believe in human “inalienable rights.”

    Why is it OK to gas millions of termites but not OK to gas millions of Jews?

    Would an alien species, determined to use humanity as a food source, agree with your reasoning?

Comments are closed.

Verified by MonsterInsights