The Wrong Question

By persuading the public that non-citizens, particularly illegal immigrants, do not enjoy the same inalienable rights as law-abiding citizens (a fact refuted by the Constitution and every credible legal scholar in the country), the Deep State is leading us down a road in which all rights are transitory. [More]

True, but by getting us to chase a red herring they don’t have to worry about the answer.

[Via bondmen]

Author: admin

David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

One thought on “The Wrong Question”

  1. “The Bill of Rights was designed to protect the fundamental rights of all persons within the United States, regardless of their citizenship status, race, religion, or any other factor. When the government starts making distinctions about who is entitled to these rights, it undermines the universality that makes them so powerful. This creates a slippery slope where rights become privileges, subject to the whims of those in power.”

    That simply is not true.

    Any place in the Bill of Rights where you find the phrase “the people” you are in fact reading about one of those protected classes. Compare that to the 14th Amendment where the term used is “persons.”

    And it states that “persons” in the United States are not citizens, i.e. a member of one of those protected classes, unless they were born here or have become naturalized. I’m not sure if there is a legal definition of the term of art “the people” but you can get hints from the Militia Composition and Classes section of USC.

    Long story short, the Second Amendment does not forbid the Federal or state government(s) from infringing on the RKBA of illegal aliens simply because they are not part of “the people.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Verified by MonsterInsights