They’re Called ‘Checks and Balances’ for a Reason

When Presidents Are Right and Courts Are Wrong: Defying the Bench to Save the Nation [More]

I wouldn’t be praising some of those examples.

[Via bondmen]

facebookShare on Facebook
TwitterTweet
FollowFollow us
PinterestSave

Author: admin

David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

2 thoughts on “They’re Called ‘Checks and Balances’ for a Reason”

  1. The three branches are supposed to be in conflict.

    “It’s not a bug. Its a feature!”

  2. I agree. What an awful article. The only examples that are in any way positive didn’t involve a president contravening a court ruling.

Comments are closed.

Verified by MonsterInsights