Unfortunately, rural communities are too often an easy target for gang criminals (though Anti-Tren is also an issue in New York City), Charles stated. That’s the case in his home state of Maine: “We don’t have the infrastructure in a very rural state to put patrols up through the northern part of the state and, frankly, to even keep drugs from coming in and the gangs from coming here.” [More]
Translation: Democrats have brought the illegals in counting on the problem being so intractable that a pathway to citizenship beocmes inevitable, meanwhile passing citizen disarmament edicts making the populace dependent on government that has no interest beyond demanding obedience and exploiting it.
[Via Michael G]
What does it say when a major political party believes that third world street gang cadre are preferable to current citizens?
“We don’t have the infrastructure in a very rural state to put patrols up through the northern part of the state and, frankly, to even keep drugs from coming in and the gangs from coming here.”
Then all the local residents need to form a militia as the founders intended, and not wait for official ‘protectors’ to solve their rural community crime problems. They should muster, set up communication systems, invite their nearest LE department to proffer advice (or even the local sheriff to deputize them), and, with or without that assistance and advice, get ready to defend themselves.
Bingo. I’d started to go there but then remembered the Governor, Senate President and Speaker are all Democrats and their idea of a “Republican” is Susan Collins.