Notes from the Resistance
When Reality Bites: Gavin Newsom Has No Clue on Concealed Carry [More]
Sorry, PJ Media, but if you don’t think he knows exactly what he’s doing and why, you have no clue.
“Not evil just wrong” is both wishful thinking and self-destructive denial.
Reality bites.
[Via Dan Gifford]
The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a Hawaii law that makes it a crime for gun owners to bring their guns onto private property that is open to the public unless they have the property owner’s specific consent. In Wolford v. Lopez, by a vote of 6-3, the justices agreed with a group of Maui residents with concealed-carry permits that the law violates the Second Amendment’s guarantee of the right to bear arms. Thursday’s decision will have an impact not only in Hawaii, but also in four other states – California, Maryland, New York, and New Jersey – with similar laws. [More]
They got another one right!
Maybe I should ease up on John Roberts…? Until next time…?
“The Trump Administration is fighting as hard as it can to continue violating the Second Amendment rights of millions of Americans. Even though the Fifth Circuit already held that these bans are unconstitutional, the government is trying to limit the decision’s reach so it can keep disarming peaceable adults across the country. This is how the United States government celebrates 250 years of American independence—by acting like the tyrants we defeated. [More]
Just after getting an “attagirl.”
I’m telling ya: Bipolar.
It’s not showing up on Google yet and I have no corroboration or further details at this time.
[Via Jess]
UPDATE
See comments for confirmation links from AmmoLand, YouTube and Red State.
Cait Conley Cruises to Victory in Suburbs as Socialism Sweeps the City [More]
And as a veteran, we should believe in the rightness of her citizen disarmament agenda, that is if we want to ignore the false authority logical fallacy and forget that one of our greatest “war heroes” was also the man who’s name became synonymous with being a traitor…
So we need to get behind Mike Lawler, right, the guy “the gun lobby thanks with campaign cash“?
You know, the guy who wants to ban “undetectable firearms,” joined other Vichycons in funding Biden’s Office of Anti-Gun Strategy who went on national TV and bragged about expanding “red flag laws”, and has proven himself to be an embedded enemy on numerous occasions…?
But…but…but politics is the art of the possible and the perfect is the enemy of the good, those who have been leading us down the path of “compromise” (aka preemptive surrender) will object. If he doesn’t win, a really, really anti-gun Democratic Socialist will!
So what’s she going to do? Ban your guns? And you’d obey?
See? The Second Amendment is still working.
How pathetic of a guncuck would you have to be to vote for this serial political adulterer?
[Via Andy M]
After Hemani, Bruen’s History and Tradition Test Has a New Target [More]
Several, actually.
And we ought to be pressing for more than 2A.
* Founders
DOJ enforcing the Second Amendment…
Imagine that. Now imagine NRA “loyalists” — in California of all places — being so against it they resort to spreading insults and lies and blocking the truth.
CALL HOUSE SPEAKER DESTIN HALL AND RULES CHAIR BELL
TELL HIM WE DEMAND A VOTE ON SB50 VETO OVERRIDE IN THE HOUSE A RECORDED VOTE IMMEDIATELY [More]
If they were doing their jobs, you’d have received a message urging your support from them.
Illegal Immigrant Busted After Using Uber Gig to Kidnap, Assault Passenger [More]
Hey, rules are rules.
I wonder if management would sign one of these:
[Via Michael G]
Australians who defend themselves against an armed invader inside their own homes can be charged with a crime. [More]
Funny, who the laws don’t stop there…
Poll: Most Democrats Say Illegal Aliens Should Remain in U.S. and Eventually Apply for Citizenship [More]
What we don’t know is why the gun groups are deliberately ignoring the threat, and why prominent gun influencers are equating concern over that with white supremacy and/or minimizing it all by saying just wait a generation or two, as if the culture those generations will grow up in won’t have changed, and as if we have a generation or two for them to come around once a prohibitionist supermajority controls things.
Why I’m the only 0ne taking them on is also, frankly, a disappointment.
[Via Andy M]
If guns could speak they would say nothing of solidarity or community; they would articulate only fear of the stranger and rage at life’s tenuous hold. [More]
But they can’t, can they?
I’ve talked before about Academia .edu because I get a laugh over how often a guy who was usually on the wrong end of the Dean’s List is cited there. This 10-year-old article was featured in a recent email they sent me, and it’s illustrative of the ivory tower mindset that controls monolithic narrative promulgators that represent themselves as “institutions of higher learning.”
The gun violence narrative starts falling apart under the data [Watch]
I may write this one up– I see some good stuff we can use and some assumptions screaming for clarification.
[Via Dan Gifford]
If I thought they were serious about it I might reconsider.
That means not just invaders but scouring the Shire of domestic abettors/enforcers.
Many “conservatives” revere any Trump administration policy as if Moses himself had carried it down from Mount Sinai. [More]
If I go by my own experience, Darwin can expect angry missives from MAGA über alles types demanding to know if he would rather have Kamala and canceling subscriptions in 3…2..1…
2026 Firearms and Ammunition Compliance Conference – Co Hosted with FRAC [More]
900 bucks? Too rich for my blood. Besides, anybody see any 2A advocates among the keynote speakers?
Who thinks salvation will come from the industry?
The US Supreme Court decision in Hemani offers great support to the 2A challenges to Virginia gun ban laws. [Watch]
He’s right when he observes “shall not be infringed” must be viewed and argued in the context of what The Framers would have considered to be infringements when it comes to “dangerous and unusual.”
I’d like to see him acknowledge that “in common use at the time” needs to include arms that standing army soldiers deploy with, not just what’s commercially popular, because otherwise, the machinegun ban will continue and any new developments in arms technology will be withheld from We the People.
And the bottom line is, prohibition does not work in a society that has rights, and you need to amp up the totalitarianism to where it does. If someone can’t be trusted with a gun…
[Via Jess]
The question on everyone’s mind: Will the case be appealed? They have 15 days. He would like to and will give the matter serious consideration. [More]
I’ve updated “Judge Rules Against Injunction in Militia Challenge to VA Gun Ban” with a synopsis and transcript of yesterday’s Zoom meeting.
ATF Director: Adamiak’s sentence “excessive” [More]
As previously noted, he’s missing the point.
But what I want to focus on is this business of ATF Firearm Enforcement Officer Jeffrey Bodell spreading falsehoods under oath to affect trial outcomes, and how is that anything but prejudicial perjury? Everybody realizes ATF has been getting away with that for years right?
But don’t take my word for it: