Never-Before-Seen 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre Photos [More]
Yeah, well, at least they don’t allow human rights violations…
[Via WiscoDave]
Notes from the Resistance
Never-Before-Seen 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre Photos [More]
Yeah, well, at least they don’t allow human rights violations…
[Via WiscoDave]
How, when your Social Security check could be cut by $500 a month: Report [More]
Noting all the waste, fraud and abuse, and money spent on illegals…
I sure wish I’d had the money they took from me all my working life (and forced my employers to cough up, thereby lowering my wages) to invest. Instead, we’ve been coerced into dependency by a government that presumes to be more responsible with our money than we would be, and which, despite denials, was the long-term plan all along.
Theoretically, who should be hanged?

So, the state ran checks they had no authority to run yet based on an emergency that didn’t clear the bar to be an emergency while ignoring an injunction that’s still sitting on the judge’s desk. [Watch]
Checks and balances? We ain’t got no checks and balances. We don’t need no checks and balances. I don’t have to show you any stinking checks and balances!
If they don’t have to obey the law, why should we have to obey their lawlessness?
[Via Jess]

The dust has settled on Oregon’s primary, and the general election is looming. [More]
You gotta admit, my comment poster has a point.
Virginia state Sen. Saddam Azlan Salim (D) is telling prosecutors who say they will not enforce his “assault weapons” ban to quit “tough guy posturing.” [More]
What was I just talking about…?
What idiots some of our “gun rights leaders” are.
[Via bondmen]

This is citizen disarmament, just as certainly and just as seriously as if this were being imposed by extreme gun prohibitionist Democrats in New York City or Chicago. [More]
Musical B-listers shouldn’t be the only ones “getting the yips.”
“The officers chose to prioritize the accusation of racial abuse over saving the life of this young man,” Jenrick said. “I think that was a terrible mistake.” [More]
See, as long as you lot excuse policy as a “mistake,” there’s no hope of changing it. Or this:
They’ll never “give” what ought to be taken. And how soon until running and hiding are prosecuted as hateful assumptions?
Coming soon, to a pradesh near you:

And, of course, this self-outed twit’s response is to ban knives.
[Via CP]
This has got to be one of the most frustrating processes that I can think of because there’s just nothing that we could do to stop it. Or at least that’s how it feels. But this is what happens when the left has a super majority in the state. They could pass whatever they want without a care in the world because there just isn’t enough opposition to make a difference. And when they get so much support from the executive, it becomes a a game of who can pass what the fastest regardless of the Constitution. And that’s exactly what we have here. [Watch]
“Don’t like bad gun laws?” she asked. “Tell Congress, ” she answered.
I’d suggest another way, but I wouldn’t want the “gun rights” establishment to call me “juvenile.”
[Via Jess]
New York’s ban on 3D-printed guns sparks First Amendment concerns [More]
And the Second…?
“Sold in the state”…?
How far is it to the nearest free state?
Meet the New Leader of Massachusetts’s Top Teachers’ Union, a DSA Member Who Says the US Is ‘Fascist,’ Borders Are for ‘Colonizers,’ and Israel Is ‘Genocidal’ [More]
This is what is indoctrinating “our Posterity” and using tax plunder from the productive capitalist sector to do it.
Guess what happens to anyone opposing its “uprising”?
Are you sleeping, bourgeoisie?
Anyone think that peace with such as these is possible?
Besides stupid Republicans?
[Via Michael G]
The Office of New Jersey Attorney General Davenport has sent subpoenas to New Jersey federally licensed firearms dealers (FFLs) demanding detailed records pertaining to sales of Glock firearms from January 2016 until June 15, 2026, News2A recently learned. The action, which is related to the December 2024 lawsuit brought against Glock called Davenport v. Glock (formerly Platkin v. Glock), could create a public record doxing New Jersey gun owners who have purchased Glock pistols, along with personally identifiable information… “This is a logistical nightmare. It could take some people years to comply with this,” one New Jersey FFL owner told News2A. [More]
So, have any prominent FFLs pledged to refuse to comply and not give up names?
Would you submit to this?
[Via Jess]
Communist, socialist activists push 20-hour workweek, property seizures as presence at protests grows – Activists say factories, mines and businesses should be placed under collective control [More]
Are you sleeping, bourgeoisie?
There’s never a Chilean helicopter around when you really need one.
Say, who’s up for some Minnesota DFW “gun control”?
To paraphrase Dr. Banner: Don’t make us give up rule of Constitutional law. You wouldn’t like us when we give up rule of Constitutional law.

Disarming anyone disfavored by the state is one of the oldest power guarantors devised by governments, and this happening in Germany recalls another set of laws imposed within the lifetimes of people still living. [More]
It’s déjà vu all over again.
And now those radicals are activating the nutcase element of their movement to kill any public figure who dares disagree. That is not an accident. There is no lie they will not tell, no censorship they will not impose, and no political opponent they will not assassinate. All in pursuit of power and control. Specifically, power and control over you. [More]
Like Paul, I’d prefer resolving things at the ballot box, but it may be that a critical mass of gun owners don’t. I just wonder how many of those have a realistic backup plan that anticipates and has prepared for extended disruptions, hardships and losses, versus how many of those are just lazy and uninformed self-entitled beneficiaries of the efforts and sacrifices of others.
For those of you still committed to using the remarkable system bequeathed to us by the Framers, may I suggest a primer?
Hell no.
Remember when establishment gun groups were dissing “We will not comply“?
Ask ’em if they will, and that will tell you much.
[Via Jess]

Plaintiffs have filed a motion for summary judgment in Roberts v. ATF, one of the Second Amendment Foundation’s (SAF) three supported lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act’s (NFA) registration requirements for short-barreled firearms and silencers. [More]
I just keep coming back to “shall not be infringed” and wonder what evil madness has gripped what was supposed to be the exemplar of Liberty, and, noticing who’s fighting us on this and where the buck stops, what all those high-sounding promises really meant.