The Anti-Kraken

But The New York Times reported in early April that covert Chinese accounts are masquerading as supporters of former President Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee. These accounts are also promoting conspiracy theories, stoking domestic divisions and attacking Biden ahead of the election in November. [More]

Just to be clear, when election fraud allegations point at Democrats, they’re “baseless.”

And since “Russian collusion” didn’t work, we’ll just change the meme to “Chinese.”

One Question

Look at all the defiant Americans in comments telling you in no uncertain terms that “We will not disarm.” Pass your treasonous ban and resistance will only grow stronger.

How many of your countrymen are you willing to order your enforcers to kill if they refuse to bend to your will?

A question’s no good unless you ask it.

New Biden Rule Makes ‘Buybacks’ Potential Seller Traps

An email I sent out this morning to my “small cadre” of advisors:

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-04-19/pdf/2024-07838.pdf

“The definition of ‘to predominantly earn a profit’ now focuses only on whether the intent underlying the sale or disposition of firearms is predominantly one of obtaining pecuniary gain… ’ to define the terms ‘purchase’ and ‘sale’ as they apply to dealers to include any method of payment or medium of exchange for a firearm…”

Did they just tank anonymous “buybacks” with “no questions asked”? I know some gun owners publicize selling cheap junk for a profit… I don’t see a carve out for buybacks in the text (albeit I only did a word search and have not pored through the whole mess).

It turns out Armed Attorneys addressed that in a video Len Savage sent me the link to, along with this observation:

Fun fact: The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act was touted to close the “gun show loophole” to prevent buying a firearm without a background check,

However; There is NOTHING in the rule (based on the law passed) that effects or applies to a BUYER.

NOTHING!

Meaning it would only affect the seller of a firearm to a buyback program.

Don’t take my word on it, here are two attorneys discussing it.

The relevant section starts at 8:12:

So it looks like they outsmarted themselves, and now need to ignore their own rule.

So, every time the antis hold a buyback, why not loudly complain and warn people they’re being invited to violate “commonsense gun safety laws”?

Happy Patriots Day

From your friends at”AFT”… [More]

I always observed it on April 19 to celebrate armed citizens resisting tyranny, but I guess some do it on the third Monday of April, which in this case was tax deadline day, which seems to miss some key points.

Speaking if missing key points, this was how the Biden White House celebrated it:

Bidenschwein, Bidenschwein, Every Morning You Greet Me

A Google search of the term brings up various images (search at your own risk) depicting the former president as, well, a pig. With a swastika armband. That suggests the characterization started online and was adopted later by people in the president’s orbit. [More]

The national socialists are projecting again, I see…

And remember: It’s not just Trump they’re referring to.

And they demand we surrender our guns.

A Plan Comes Together

Good thing this has nothing to do with that “single issue.” And I have that on good authority.

And still, no “single issue” deflector or open borders “libertarian” will take my challenge.

AP Puff Piece on New Biden Background Check Rule Hides Dangers to Freedom

Curious how much less “gun violence” there was in this country before Democrats started imposing all this “progress.” [More]

Once more we’re being lied to, and the biggest ally would-be totalitarians have in imposing their treachery are complicit Fourth Estate Fifth Columnists.

The Fuddy Professor

Can students get their tuition back?

I wonder if anyone still has a copy of the course syllabuses, assignments, and tests to establish the depth of his Second Amendment focus…

[Via bondmen]

We’re Back to Pre-Fast and Furious, Aren’t We?

During an interview with Univision that took place last Wednesday and aired on Tuesday, President Joe Biden stated that he would consider taking further executive action on guns and criticized 2024 Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump because Trump “famously told the NRA that, don’t worry, no one’s going to touch your guns” if Trump won. [More]

I just wish I could believe him.

[Via bondmen]

LaRose By Any Other Name

But they overlooked a state law in Ohio, and the party now faces the possibility that Joe Biden’s name won’t be listed as a presidential candidate in the fall… The law came to the attention of Democrats recently when Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose notified them. [More]

Gee, thanks, Frank,

Napoleon he ain’t.

And that, along with flirting with No Labels and being a dolt during Covid, is why a flip-flopping gun fraud kicked his @$$.

A De Facto Admission

DOJ seeks prison time for woman who stole Ashley Biden’s diary [More]

So showers with the Big Guy were real and the only character the “real reporters” at The Hill can question is the woman who exposed them?

Far be it they express outrage over official intimidation of journalists.

[Via Jess]

UPDATE

I hope they like my rhyme.

Prohibitionists Gonna Prohibit

Groups representing minorities, like the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement and the nonprofit National Action Network, the latter which was founded by civil rights leader Rev. Al Sharpton, argue that banning menthol cigarettes while not restricting non-menthol cigarettes “puts a microscope on minority communities.” They say it could increase the probability of negative interactions between police and minorities. [More]

Off one who resists arrest and watch more than the contraband go up in smoke. And best of all, we can blame it on Democrats.

Y’know, you could draw a parallel between the ineffectual laws against cigarettes and other goods

Make Sure to Leave Holes You Could Drive a Truck Through and Tie It In With Foreign Aid or No Deal

Exclusive: U.S. Must Move ‘Decisively’ to Avert ‘Extinction-Level’ Threat From AI, Government-Commissioned Report Says [More]

So it doesn’t just want us to serve and worship it?

Maybe the Republican “leadership” can work out the same kind of “bipartisan” arrangement with Biden as they got on the border.

Verified by MonsterInsights