Notes from the Resistance
Bernalillo County Sheriff John Allen said the sheriff’s office fired a deputy after his county-issued AR-15 was used in a New Year’s Day killing. [More]
So, at what point did it magically morph from a “patrol rifle” to a weapon of war only suitable for killing as many people in as short a time as possible?
Perhaps an experiment with a high-speed camera could shed some light…?
[Via Jess]
The Democratic governor’s changes to House Bill 217/Senate Bill 749 remove the word “fixed” from part of the bill’s definition of an assault firearm, which could sharply expand the range of semi-automatic rifles and pistols swept into the ban, Republicans say. [More]
It’s good that DOJ is going to fight this, but let’s be careful not to turn “common use” into a trap.
Ultimately, it boils down to how many Virginians are committed to the Commonwealth’s motto.
Hudson man accused of beating grandmother to death with skateboard, also injuring father and sister [More]
Not my Hudson, but if Antifa blue hairs were involved I’d see where crazy begets crazy.
So now we have assault skateboards and skateboard violence? Hey, they’ve already got “commonsense skateboard safety laws.”
Gettin’ kinda crowded in here on what people can’t be trusted with.
When I had mine, they were still called “sidewalk surfboards.” It never did occur to me to kill anybody with it.
[Via Edmund M]
Oh, look: False authority. Lemme show you what I mean.
Meet self-identified Korea/Vietnam vet Paul A. Ransom, who “expertly” informs us:
The explosive in a bullet is the same as the explosive in a bomb. Just a smaller amount. Bombs are under tight control. Bombs can be purchased, but not without the proper credentials. We as American citizens have the right to bare arms, but nothing in the Constitution gives us the right to have a bomb or bullets.
Remember who one of our greatest “war heroes” once was.
[Via Jess]
Chief Patron of HB217, Del. Helmer, is on record saying they want them all gone. Helmer, a Jew, clearly is not familiar with JPFO, or the history of disarmament of Jews in the 20th century, and the consequences thereof.
And not just these. He and his treasonous kind want them all but most are politically savvy enough to know that it’s too soon to show all theirs cards.
Not to criticize my friend Aaron Zelman, who is no longer around to offer rebuttal, but “bagel brain” is too excusing of evil. That Helmer has a distinguished military career makes it worse, in a Benedict Arnold kinda way.
Another thing worth repeating: When the hell is SCOTUS gonna slap down such nonsense and put an end to it? Because if they don’t do it before Republicans hand over the keys in the midterms and ’28, all those gun owners who didn’t vote and made this outcome inevitable are going to find out what doing it the hard way entails.
Proposed Minnesota legislation HF 3433 (often associated with HF 3434) includes provisions that would allow law enforcement to conduct warrantless, at-will inspections of private homes to ensure compliance with storage regulations for registered “semiautomatic military-style assault weapons” (SAMSAWs)… To retain previously owned semiautomatic rifles, owners must agree to allow law enforcement to inspect their home storage at any time without a warrant. [More]
“Registered”…?
Not for tyrants and traitors I won’t.
If you can ignore the Second Amendment, you don’t have to worry about the Fourth. Or the First. Or…
I’d like to believe there’s a special place in hell for Walz, but how special could it be when so many deserve to be there?
[Via Jess]
SUPREME COURT Slams AR15 Case 2026 Gun Rights Status Check [Watch]
More balking around the edges when the true issue is invalidating NFA and all infringements, which won’t happen unless there’s a credible “or else” backing up the demand.
The real outrage is Nancy Maldanado was confirmed to the Seventh Ciruit 47-43, and seven Republicans didn’t vote.
[Via DDS]
Seeberger has since resolved to support “whatever it takes” to make Minnesota safer. “I’ll be yes on anything and everything that comes through that will really make a difference to reduce gun violence here in the state of Minnesota,” she said in a recent interview. [More]
So why is this oath-breaking useful idiot still being referred to as a “moderate legislator”?
[Via Michael G]
Official Everytown for Gun Safety Poll … Should Congress ban assault weapons? [More]
I wish those saying “Absolutely” would flesh out what they estimate an attempt will cost in human lives lost to “gun violence” and how that compares to reality…
They won’t tally your response unless you give them contact info, so I resurrected a tactic from the old Million Moon March.
I wonder if ATF’s number takes texts?
How many times do they need to be rejected before they become stalkers?
Actually, it’s not that he doesn’t want to. It’s just that they’re frustrated he can’t satisfy them and are complaining to the neighbors about it.
Viramontes’s criticism of Bevis on this point carries little weight, given Heller’s holding that “the Second Amendment does not protect those weapons not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes[.]” Id. at 625. Heller did not hold, as Viramontes seems to imply, that military-style weapons are protected “arms” because military action by civilians is lawful. Instead, Heller characterized self-defense as the “core lawful purpose” of firearm use. 554 U.S. at 630. [More]
I beg to differ. And have warned that ignoring the militia aspect would be used against us.
Funny, how a common prohibitionist argument is that 2A advocates ignore the first 13 words, and here it is they’re doing just that in their legal argument.
In any case, the amendment says “arms.” And as for the contention that its ban “finds support in this nation’s history and tradition,” tell that to Tench Coxe.
F-n’ lying Illinois Democrats…
[Via Jess]
In response to a question of whether the people decide subjectively what they deem appropriate for self-defense, New Jersey argued that “the people” through their representatives decide what is unusually dangerous based on their perception of “objective characteristics.” As one judge suggested, since all firearms are dangerous under the alleged dangerous-or-unusual test, no limit would exist on what the legislature may choose to ban, despite what the people choose. [More]
Look at all the contortions these robed Democrats go through to obfuscate the unambiguous clarity of “shall not be infringed.”
How many horses and hounds may I keep, again…?
[Via Michael G]
“This program is really a way to help lawful gun owners stay in compliance with the law.” [Watch]
Talk about industrial grade weasel wording… and what a perfect example of actual fascist mentality.
Then we have Thing 2, a frickin’ Sri Lankan refugee who repays the people who took him in with “Obey of die” mandates.
According to what the premier’s spokesperson told me, Alberta’s response is “Not on our watch.”
FBI Director Says ‘Assault Weapon Ban’ Could ‘Prevent Future Attacks’ in Some Instances, Declines to Endorse Legislation [More]
We got us a Kash flow problem…
COURTROOM AUDIO LIVE: AR & Mag Ban Arguments Reveal How Nefarious These Blue States Actually Are… [Watch]
You don’t need full auto because the government has it? We’re limited to “self-defense”? And only indoors? Anybody see the word “useful” in the Second Amendment…?
Are “average” <3-round limits next?
Everybody’s picking up that it’s “common usage” arguments they’re arguing to impose limits, right?
[Via Jess]
So, decided to dig a bit on her and SURPRISE!!! Since 2019, she’s been an active donor to Democrat politicians who call for the same thing she is. She’s an active activist Democrat. [More]
Just building on a narrative…
[Via Non_Fudd’s Ghost]
