Apples And Oranges

Maine lawmakers call on Cabela’s, Kittery Trading Post to stop selling ‘assault rifles’ [More]

Well, yeah, because “gunman, Robert Card, bought one of his weapons, a handgun, at the Cabela’s in Scarborough.”

Don’t worry– the grabbers’ll come back to their initial goal in due time:

[Enlarge in new tab]

[Via bondmen]

Minnesota ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Includes ‘Fixed Magazine’ .22s Holding More Than 10 Rounds

There’s one other disqualifier though that should clear up ATF Director Steve Dettelbach’s inability to define what an “assault weapon” is, itself reminiscent of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson taking a pass on defining “woman.” He should have just said “A Marlin 70620 Model 60 .22 Long Rifle.” [More]

Man, they’re letting anything be a “weapon of war” these days…

A Right Delayed

Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discuses the three pieces of huge news where three separate petitions to the United States Supreme Court have been filed asking for review of Illinois’ assault weapon and magazine bans. This, added to the other petition filed last week in the matter of Bianchi v. Brown, means that there is now four separate peititions before SCOTUS to settle this once and for all. [Watch]

You can’t put it off any longer, SCOTUS.

Make your decision.

Some of us have already made ours.

[Via Jess]

A Word of Caution

Attorneys representing the Second Amendment Foundation and its partners in a federal challenge of the Illinois ban on modern semi-auto firearms and “large-capacity magazines” have filed a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking certiorari in the case of Harrel v. Raoul. [More]

Be careful that you don’t turn “common use” into a precedential limitation.

Back for Another Round

The Second Amendment Foundation and Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms have once again petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to grant certiorari in their continuing challenge of Maryland’s ban on so-called “assault weapons.” [More]

How much longer can they avoid the inevitable?

There Can Be Only Ones

“We really only want firearms in the hands of those who can handle a firearm responsibly,” said Sen. Barbara Favola. [More]

As evidenced by a badge, right, Babs?

Meanwhile, our fellow violence monopolists in other states are eliminating citizen safety training and encouraging those who can’t handle firearms responsibly to handle them.

[Via Mack H]

Kicking the Can

The Kali Key completely changes the classification from Semi to Non Regulated Bolt Action. [Watch]

Or as an old friend of mine once said:

I sometimes wonder whether the socialists will issue an edict requiring all firearms to have a pink ribbon tied to the barrel, just to get a belly laugh as the panicked descendants of once-proud American patriots scurry to comply.

[Via Jess]

Harassment Lawfare

Families sue Kentucky gun shop that sold AR-15 used in 2023 bank shooting that killed 5 [More]

How dare River City Fireams clerks not have magic mental powers to know that Democrat gun prohibitionists are violent lunatics waiting to happen?

Natural sympathy for the families does not give them a right to infringe on ours, and when they try, they need to be repelled just like any aggressor with delusional motives.

I wonder how ambulance chaser Tad Thomas and the partners over at Romanucci & Blandin look in halter tops and faux leopardskin hotpants as they solicit motorists…

And I wonder if their Everytown johns are ever going to be slapped with a nuisance lawsuit and court sanctions for continually ignoring PLCAA…

[Via Jess]

Crazy Like a Fox

Crazy news out of California. the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: A three- judge panel has decided that they are going to literally, literally do nothing, do nothing for likely over a year when it comes to the case of Miller vs. Bonta… [Watch]

The robed traitors are waiting for the fix to come in on the elections so Democrats can reshape SCOTUS and reverse Bruen

[Via Jess]

Self-Incriminate Much?

Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, asks “what the hell are you thinking registering your firearms after the deadline?” New numbers from the Illinois State Police show that many of you decided to register after the deadline imposed by new Illinois law and that, is not a really bright move. Why? We’ll explain, so it’s time for you to learn more and arm yourself with education. [Watch]

Just put your head on this chopping block…

[Via Jess]

On a Roll

All New Mexicans deserve to be safe in their communities, which is why we’re requiring a 14-day waiting period for the purchase of firearms, banning assault weapons, and raising the purchase age to 21 for all firearms… We’ll also prohibit guns in public parks and on playgrounds, allow law enforcement to directly file Extreme Risk Protection Orders, and increase penalties for for felons in possession of a firearm… [More]

And if she gets that, who thinks it won’t be on to the next infringement, and then the next…?

That’s why they call these powwer perverts totalitarians.

Tangentially Related UPDATE

Some Republican lawmakers are putting forward legislation to impeach the governor, and it all goes back to the public health order that was enacted last September, an attempt to ban guns in public area. [More]

Yeah, well, enjoy the headline because that’s all you’re going to get.

[Via Jess]

The Nutty Professor

You DON’T need an assault weapon to protect your family or house, nor do you need one for hunting, unless you are hunting elephants. The Only ones that need assault weapons is the military and law enforcement. [More]

It figures some insulated Piled Higher and Deeper ivory tower moron who would take on an elephant with a .223 would also express childlike faith in the “Only Ones“…

We’re the Only Ones Forgiving Enough

Illinois State Police won’t pursue charges on those who register assault weapons after Jan. 1 deadline [More]

Talk about tryin g to save face…

So come on, 99%. There’s still time to set yourself up for confiscation!

As for the 1% that have, Henry V would like a word

Are You Sure That You Can Skin Griz?

Less than 1% of Illinois gun owners register banned weapons as deadline passes [More]

Skin that, Pritzker, and we’ll get you another!

Throw this noncompliance in the face of any cowardly gun owner, “rights leader,” or politician who says “Enforce existing gun laws.”

Approaching Zero Hour

Judge declines to stay assault weapons ban ahead of Jan. 1 registration deadline [More]

What are your options when your own government, headed by a morbidly obese collectivist billionaire, makes you a criminal for refusing to surrender your rights and his allied political courts take away all means of peaceable recourse?

[Via Jess]

Just Kneel Down and Rest Your Head on This Block…

Protect Illinois Communities Act Statistics
Number of Individuals Completing a Disclosure: 8,143
Total Disclosures: 24,381
Firearms Disclosures: 15,877
Accessory Disclosures: 8,335
Ammunition Disclosures: 169 [More]

My guess is hypocritical Fudds and Democrats, and “law-abiding” Vichycons.

Easy for me to say, right?

And only 2.5m FOID cards out of 10m adults? I wonder how many guns are held without the card…

[Via Jess]

Deliberate Indifference

Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals denies motion for en banc hearing of challenge against Illinois’ gun and magazine ban. “No judge in regular active service has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc, and all members of the original panel have voted to deny panel rehearing,” the docket said Monday. “The petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is therefore DENIED.” [More]

Will this be a catalyst for SCOTUS?

If You Need More Than 10 Rounds You Shouldn’t Be Defending Yourself

“In the right hands, a weapon can save lives. The war demonstrated this — whenever weapons were present, disasters were smaller,” he said in late October. “A gun can save a family, and an assault rifle can save a building. A weapon can protect you, your family, your street and your country.” [More]

But only in Israel and not here, if you believe WaPo.

And why wouldn’t we?

[Via Jess]

Illinois Shows Disinterest in Judicial Conflict Challenge as More Evidence Emerges

It’s fair to ask how, in anyone’s universe, such conduct would not be grounds for removal from the court, disbarment from the practice of law, and criminal prosecution. [More]

Do radical Democrat prohibitionists really want to tell tens of millions of gun owners that the courts are no longer available to them to seek redress against infringements of their fundamental rights?

Verified by MonsterInsights