“Agree to disagree” is a phrase that ends a conversation. We want to start one. [More]
Yeah, but then you lie to me. Sorry, not interested in doing anything other than exposing you and your ultimate agenda.
The Ad Council = Professional propagandists. Everything they demand relies on violence monopoly enforcers with guns.
I agree to expose fascist establishment whores. I agree to defy. I agree to resist.
[Via Michael G]
Once again, they want to “start a conversation”. The Brady bunch wanted to do this years ago, Moms Demand and Everytown somewhat more recently.
One problem: That “conversation” has been ongoing for years, decades even. Since the very first “gun control” act was debated, it has never stopped.
The pro-freedom side has always been willing to talk and make our points — including logic, facts, independent studies, and SCOTUS decisions — known. It’s the anti-freedom side that always wants to control the scope and the talking points, devolves into ad hominem attacks, and shuts down the conversation (usually via some variety of censorship) the second it doesn’t go their way.
They don’t want to start a conversation; they want to start a monologue. I predict this attempt will go like all the others, and in five years they’ll want to “start a conversation” … again … like we’ve never had one.