Barr for NRA President Would Prove Association Has Learned Nothing

Telling the audience how he improved a bad bill hardly addressed his assertion that Lautenberg “is strong protection for women and children,” or his claim that his amending language kept it from being “declared unconstitutional.” He then goes on to support the concept of “prohibited persons.” So, the answer is, no, he wouldn’t repudiate his past support and spearhead the effort to repeal it. Instead, he preferred you to be caught in the trap and then go through a Catch-22 appeals process. [More]

More to the point: What’s a gun-grab proponent even doing on the NRA board in the first place?

facebookShare on Facebook
TwitterTweet
FollowFollow us
PinterestSave

Author: admin

David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

2 thoughts on “Barr for NRA President Would Prove Association Has Learned Nothing”

  1. I think most of us were pretty sure they hadn’t given the way they let LaPierre resign instead of firing the weasel.

    I apologize to any real weasels who may have been offended by being compared to the former NRA EVP.

  2. What a joke the NRA is. Amazing how the GOA has been able to accomplish so much with a fraction of the budget. If the NRA behaved like the GOA, I don’t know if any of the states would have gun control.

Comments are closed.

Verified by MonsterInsights