Beto O’Rourke says he does not regret saying he will take away AK-47s and AR-15s while running for president [More]
He still hasn’t fleshed out how for us.
He was speaking as if he had presidential powers, so, say it’s through executive action or even a law he signed– presuming he’s replaced enough SCOTUS justices to reverse Bruen.
Now what?
What’s it going to take to get the guns away from the, say, Three Percent who will say “Hell no, you won’t,” despite seeing some picked off to be made examples of to spook the rest of the herd…?
How far is he willing to go, and what will that do to the smooth running of society?
One wonders if “Beto” has read “Absolved.”
https://etwof.com/absolved_2.html
I had to stop one guy from publishing it on Kindle because the rights belong to Rosey. In this case, this guy says he has Mike’s son’s approval, and I won’t insert myself into that. If there is one thing I’d like to say to Mike that’s critical, it’s that she took care of him and he should have made rock solid provisions to make sure her path to compensation for his work was fixed and clear.
I agree with that 100%.
He also blew each and every rule considering preservation of important data with what was supposedly on that thumb drive, and only on that thumb drive.
I also believe that the impact of the completed and published book might have had an impact along the lines of what Mike says he intended. Instead, the unfinished, imperfect work is a footnote.
“For want of a nail …”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/For_want_of_a_nail