By Any Other Name Fifth Circuit Rules Suppressors are Not Firearms and Not Protected by the Second Amendment [More] No, of course they’re not firearms. They are, however, part of “every terrible implement of the soldier.” [Via Jess] Share on FacebookTweetFollow usSave Author: admin David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament. View all posts by admin
The NFA defines the term “firearm” to include any silencer as defined in section 921 of the GCA. 26 U.S.C. 5845(a)(7). Sounds like confliction to me. Reply
True enough, that’s how it’s defined and you’re right, that’s a legal technical conflict. I’m coming from the point of view that a bump stock is not really a machinegun and Chore Boy cleaning pads are not NFA firearms https://web.archive.org/web/20111225003044/http://www.examiner.com/gun-rights-in-national/atf-classifies-chore-boy-pot-scrubber-pads-nfa-firearms Reply
The NFA defines the term “firearm” to include any silencer as defined in section 921 of the GCA. 26 U.S.C. 5845(a)(7).
Sounds like confliction to me.
True enough, that’s how it’s defined and you’re right, that’s a legal technical conflict. I’m coming from the point of view that a bump stock is not really a machinegun and Chore Boy cleaning pads are not NFA firearms https://web.archive.org/web/20111225003044/http://www.examiner.com/gun-rights-in-national/atf-classifies-chore-boy-pot-scrubber-pads-nfa-firearms