FBI’s Las Vegas Shooter Report Raises Serious Unanswered Questions. What NFA Weapons?

The bottom line is “bump stocks,” which were “legal” at the time, could not have been the “illegally possessed prohibited firearms” referred to in the “Paddock” report. So what weapon/s are they referring to? [More]

Enquiring minds want to know…

Share on Facebook

Save

Author: admin

David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament. View all posts by admin

7 thoughts on “FBI’s Las Vegas Shooter Report Raises Serious Unanswered Questions. What NFA Weapons?”

Carl Bussjaeger says:

October 2, 2022 at 6:17 pm

THESE NFA weapons.

Per the Daily Mail on October 3, 2017:

“Clark County Sheriff Joe Lombardo said on Monday it wasn’t clear whether the full-auto gun was modified, or if it was originally made that way.”

“…full-auto assault rifles…”

“At least one of those was automatic, while another two had been modified with legal bump-stock devices…”

Funny how quickly that article disappeared.
Tim Goodrich says:

October 2, 2022 at 7:15 pm

That event has bugged me ever since it happened. Far to many unanswered questions. Hours of cell phone footage& audio reviewed and the rate of fire is too consistent for a bumpstock equipped weapon. Too many reports of shooters from other locations.
Henry says:

October 2, 2022 at 8:50 pm

They who control the past control the future.
They who control the present control the past.
—1984
Original Grandpa says:

October 2, 2022 at 9:54 pm

I live just south of Vegas, f.y.i. there are a LOT of retired military, and law enforcement and etc. hereabouts. That said, I know and most of the rest of the old timers here know what a belt fed weapon sounds like. We aren’t confused, senile, or mistaken – and have said almost constantly since that night “it was not an AR with a bump stock.” And he can run for governor or what ever; “Sheriff” Joe Lombardo knows it as well. Belt. Fed. Weapon. Which means “they” lied, and “they” altered the “crime scene” to match their narrative. There are so many effed up b.s. lies in the Route 91/1Oct false flag that it is almost laughable. Except, lots of innocent people were killed for “the agenda”. I hope the bastards that did this die.
Gosh, imagine… the government lied!
1. CPL Antero Rokka says:
  
  October 3, 2022 at 5:02 am
  
  Thanks, Orig GrandPa.
  
  Refreshing to hear a wee bit of TRUTH these days.
  
  Belt-fed vs. Bump stock…only those who’ve worn the unform know the diff.
  1. Hugh Rection says:
    
    October 3, 2022 at 3:13 pm
    
    Its possible that more than the only ones who have worn a uniform can tell the difference between BF and BS
Anonymous says:

October 3, 2022 at 1:09 pm

The answer will be whatever advances their agenda.

Comments are closed.

HOW THINGS WORK AROUND HERE

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Anyone not happy with anything on this site at any time will get 100% of all money they paid to me refunded, no questions asked. (No gratuities solicited or accepted.)

Comment House Rules

Keep them on topic. Trying to hijack threads really grinds my gears. No spam.
I moderate them so I’ll get to them when I can.
No threats against anyone except me. No fights–this is my place and if things get ugly, I treat unruly visitors the same way as I would in my home. Do not feed trolls–I’ll take out the trash.
Try to keep it clean.
I’m the final arbiter. If you don’t like the rules, start your own damn blog.

WarOnGuns Correspondents

Story tips received via email and social media messages will be credited. Just let me know how you want to be recognized (real name, first name/last initial, or screen name.)

Link Policy

I maintained a WogRoll at the old Blogspot place predicated on reciprocity with like-minded RKBA-related sites. Truth be told, I never got much in terms of site visits to make the effort worth the time. I may try to do something again in the future, but for now, my hands are more than full trying to get a new site started.

Advertising Disclosure

This is a placeholder for now because I have not done ads on the old blog for years. In case I ever start them up here, this will be the policy in effect: The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don’t think we’re getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you’re stupid, too. I have had a few ads on the old site in the past and may do so again if I think it’s worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn’t buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don’t mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now–you’re not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer without complete disclosure.

About “The Only Ones”

So named from a comment by DEA agent Lee Paige, who told a classroom full of kids he was “the only one” qualified to be armed and then promptly shot himself in the foot, the purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it’s also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank, or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they’re involved in gun-related incidents.