2 thoughts on “GOOD Flag-Burning”

  1. It’s never so clean and clear.
    “Under the measure, the only instances in which a judge could prevent an individual from owning or purchasing a gun during legal proceedings would be in certain firearm-related cases or through existing protective orders.”
    Or in the case of those judges who hold their opinions as superseding law.
    We’ll see how this goes.

  2. Bouncing off what OtG quoted: “… through existing protective orders.”

    As in, protective orders that are adjudicated, with the accused given an opportunity to defend him- or herself and present his/her own evidence, witnesses, and testimony.

    Y’know, “due process”.

    They’ve always had the tools to remove guns from dangerous individuals, after those individuals were allowed their due process and found to be dangerous. Don’t listen to any of the harpies crying that domestic abusers will be able to keep their guns; no, they won’t, not if there’s an adjudicated protective order in place.

Comments are closed.

Verified by MonsterInsights