Noting all the economic destruction, that people suffered medical complications where many died, and that disastrous long-term effects, especially on children, are yet unknown: I suggest it’s because he fears what his powerful, incentivized accomplices (in the “private sector” and in both parties) would do to him if he spills the beans on their culpability more than he does what Rand Paul will do to him if he doesn’t. And the only thing preventing them from removing him from the board is a deadman’s switch/file that names names.
If anyone has a speculative scenario that makes more sense, feel free to share it in “Comments,” below.
Related UPDATE
Citing an entry describing a June 2021 pulmonary infarction, Kennedy told Ingraham that five months after Fauci’s widely televised Moderna vaccination at the NIH, the doctor suffered a serious pulmonary event that clearly indicates a vaccine injury, yet never disclosed it to the public. Kennedy characterized that episode as evidence Fauci was “vaccine injured” while continuing to insist such side effects were not occurring at scale. [More]
Your theory may be correct, if they’re willing to endanger millions then what’s a life worth to them? And then there is this consequence about to unfold:
https://www.lucianne.com/2026/07/29/nolte_fauci_and_the_fifth_just_threw_the_cult-of-fauci_under_the_bus_169994.html
“How can he take the Fifth?”
“Fauci could either 1) tell the truth or 2) risk a contempt of Congress charge for invoking the Fifth Amendment.”
And since the era of Eric Holder, #2 is no actual risk at all.
Similar to Trump recently double-secret banning gain of function work. Obama already did that. Fauci just ignored it, end-ran it, and redefined terms like “gain of function” and “vaccine” in his own mind so that he wouldn’t be violating it.
If you never PUNISH the people who break old laws, don’t pee down our backs passing new ones.