On a Sauer Note

New Jersey Attorney General Platkin (D) filed a complaint against SIG SAUER, making numerous false and unsubstantiated claims about the P320. This false information requires immediate clarification and remedy. [More]

New Jersey Democrats don’t care about safe guns– they just want to destroy the company.

Sig is riding the tiger, holding on for dear life, knowing what will happen if they’re thrown.

Don’t look for Garden State “Only Ones” suppliers Glock, Benelli, and Colt to act like their turn in the barrel might be next. And just what the hell is an “enhanced patrol rifle,” and how does that differ from a “weapon of war designed to quickly kill as many people as possible”?

[Via Jess]

Author: admin

David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

2 thoughts on “On a Sauer Note”

  1. A question they will not answer:

    If they really are a “weapon of war designed to quickly kill as many people as possible”, why do we let cops have them?

  2. I think part of the problem here, is “law enforcement”. There was a time, when cops were called “peace officers”, they’d walk the beat, know the neighborhood, know the faces and the names, know the place so well, they’d know when something didn’t look right.
    Somewhere down the line, they got in their cars and became “law enforcement officers” and took on an aggressive militaristic type attitude of “us vs them”. Today most cops don’t even live within the jurisdiction that hired them. They’re in effect, the foreigners, and when it comes to Trevor Case, Brian Malinowski, and countless others, they, the cops are the invaders.
    That’s how we get to an “enhanced patrol rifle”.

Comments are closed.

Verified by MonsterInsights