Most people vote the way the mainstream media tells them to in the last week before the election. Whoever has editorial control of the mainstream media is steering the ship. Why do you allow media ownership to concentrate? Why do you still believe in voting?
Just to be clear: When you say “you,” do you mean “me”?
How does media concentration have anything to do with what I will allow?
And no, not particularly, but I haven’t seen any alternative plans that have picked up any speed, most gun owners are lazy f_s when it comes to activism and organizing, and I’m not seeing how the resulting naked centralized tyranny and/or turf war anarchy won’t create a new reign of terror. If you have a better plan, lay it out with more than cynical platitudes and I’ll listen. Prove the plan isn’t an unoriginal pipe dream I’ve heard before and that is easily dismantled, and I’ll follow.
in a sane country, ALL main stream media conglomerates such as abc, cbs, nbc, msnbc, cnn would lose their broadcast licenses for using the public airways to lie and propagandize the public toward communism, one worldism and destroying the constitution.
These proven traitors broadcast licenses should be confiscated by the FCC and auctioned off to companies with 100% U.S. ownership on a 10 year conditionally renewable license.
And we should not tolerate cia involvement in the media either…….after all, that is………explicitly illegal
Suppose you create an ecological niche of centralized power where an evil Hitler-type person could thrive. Then, one of the many already existing Hitler-wannabes, who spend their time looking for an opportunity, will barge in, push the moderates aside, and take over. Government is a dangerous servant and fearful master, but there is no reason to create one in the first place. Instead, why not limit the number of Hitler-types in power by habitat destruction? Logistical reality limits what can be achieved militarily. If you don’t tax money and collect it into one place, then there is no pile of logistical support available for a warlord to use to hire an army to oppress people.
It was militarily practical for warlords to exist when soldiers carried swords and spears, and a farmer couldn’t complete athletically. But modern guns, radios, etc. have completely ended that. Today grandma with a revolver holstered on her wheelchair has a decent chance of driving home invaders away. You remember how additional gun registration was thwarted in Connecticut in 2014? The targeted citizens just ignored it, and nothing happened.