Because alleged domestic abusers pose a clear threat of violence, the measure is constitutional under the high court’s United States v. Rahimi ruling, Judge Jerry E. Smith said for the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [More]
If they’re “alleged,” that hasn’t been proven and depriving them of their rights is tyranny.
If it has been proven that they pose a clear threat, leaving them free to victimize is unconscionable.
Any government that would do this to its citizens has delegitimized itself.
[Via Jess]
This ruling is what happens when the “logic” that allows for “civil asset forfeiture” is applied to individual civil rights.