What Happened to Article I, Section 8, Clause 15?

New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Kentucky, and Illinois are deploying several national guard units to the U.S.- Mexico border. [More]

Better than nothing, I guess, but this wouldn’t be needed if the affected states had citizen militias in accordance with the Constitution like they’re supposed to…

[Via bondmen]

facebookShare on Facebook
TwitterTweet
FollowFollow us
PinterestSave

Author: admin

David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

One thought on “What Happened to Article I, Section 8, Clause 15?”

  1. It wouldn’t be needed if the Supreme Court had interpreted the constitution correctly in Chae Chan Ping v. US (1889) and Fong Yue Ting v. US (1893). Instead, state sovereignty went out the window in favor of the traditional sovereignty of a national (not federal) government, and thus a “power implied in sovereignty” overrode the clear language of the constitution.

Comments are closed.

Verified by MonsterInsights