The Ban It All and Kick Off CW2 Act

You misspelled “assault,” morons.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Rep. Hank Johnson reintroduce bill with emphasis on gun violence prevention [More]

Are you really ignorant enough to believe that’s what this will do, “real reporter” Jennifer Gerson?

“And I’s“…?

Here are the Democrat politicians who want us dead.

But no one’s talking about taking your guns.

They tried it in 2020.

They tried it in 2022.

“0% chance“…?

Now all we’ve got to do is see if the House Republicans are going to implode, because they’ve already got their share of gun-grabbing traitors.

[Via Jess]

Share on Facebook

Save

Author: admin

David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament. View all posts by admin

One thought on “The Ban It All and Kick Off CW2 Act”

“emphasis on gun violence”

Funny, I don’t see anything on there that “emphasizes gun violence”. What I see harasses and criminalizes law-abiding citizens and builds multiple prior restraints into exercising Constitutionally-protected rights.

“Stronger ATF Gun Shop Inspections”: You mean, stronger than Biden’s “zero tolerance” policy?

“Grants for States to Implement Gun Safety Laws”: It’s a very short step from “grants to implement” to “penalties for not implementing”. And who gets to decide what “gun safety” laws qualify? Implementing Eddie Eagle or any other school-based gun and hunter safety programs probably won’t.

“Funding for Research into Gun Violence”: What? John Lott’s research isn’t enough? And somehow, I doubt his excellent Crime Prevention Research Center will be deemed eligible for such funding….

An unconstitutional mess all around.

Comments are closed.

HOW THINGS WORK AROUND HERE

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Anyone not happy with anything on this site at any time will get 100% of all money they paid to me refunded, no questions asked. (No gratuities solicited or accepted.)

Comment House Rules

Keep them on topic. Trying to hijack threads really grinds my gears. No spam.
I moderate them so I’ll get to them when I can.
No threats against anyone except me. No fights–this is my place and if things get ugly, I treat unruly visitors the same way as I would in my home. Do not feed trolls–I’ll take out the trash.
Try to keep it clean.
I’m the final arbiter. If you don’t like the rules, start your own damn blog.

WarOnGuns Correspondents

Story tips received via email and social media messages will be credited. Just let me know how you want to be recognized (real name, first name/last initial, or screen name.)

Link Policy

I maintained a WogRoll at the old Blogspot place predicated on reciprocity with like-minded RKBA-related sites. Truth be told, I never got much in terms of site visits to make the effort worth the time. I may try to do something again in the future, but for now, my hands are more than full trying to get a new site started.

Advertising Disclosure

This is a placeholder for now because I have not done ads on the old blog for years. In case I ever start them up here, this will be the policy in effect: The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don’t think we’re getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you’re stupid, too. I have had a few ads on the old site in the past and may do so again if I think it’s worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn’t buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don’t mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now–you’re not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer without complete disclosure.

About “The Only Ones”

So named from a comment by DEA agent Lee Paige, who told a classroom full of kids he was “the only one” qualified to be armed and then promptly shot himself in the foot, the purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it’s also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank, or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they’re involved in gun-related incidents.