Rights Free Zones

Pursuant to Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the States of New York, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawai‘i, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia submit this brief as amici curiae in support of the appellee, the United States of America, and ask this Court to reaffirm the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(3), which makes it unlawful to transfer or receive a firearm from out of state, except through a federally licensed firearms dealer, importer, or manufacturer. [More]

What “infringemwent”? This is “commnonsense safety.”

So, just the Second Amendment or does the rest of the Bill of Rights threaten “exercis[ing] their police power,” too…?

[Via Antigone]

Author: admin

David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

3 thoughts on “Rights Free Zones”

  1. Not one word of what we now call “The Bill of Rights” was intended to make government’s job easier.

    1. Not to mention that NOWHERE in the US Constitution does Government have the responsibility to “keep the people safe”. Nope. Not one jot nor tittle does that bit.
      Government’s Job One is to preserve our RIGHTS. When that happens WE can easily see to our own “protection” and “safety”.

      These wilful dirtbags fail to comprehend this basic fact/principle.

Comments are closed.

Verified by MonsterInsights