4 thoughts on “A Prohibited Person”

  1. An interesting conundrum is that the GCA ostensibly prohibits “any individual…while being employed for any [prohibited] person,” from receiving or possessing firearms “in the course of such employment.” 18 U.S.C. § 922(h). I would take this to mean that a convicted felon could hire bodyguards, but that those bodyguards could not be *armed* with firearms while performing their duties. What about Secret Service protection for a former president who is convicted of a felony; would they have to be unarmed while providing protection? However, I don’t know what the case law, if any, is on this issue.

  2. One debate that never seems to go away is whether the “arms” referred to by the Second Amendment include things like Trident missile subs.

    I’m expecting another try by House Democrats to have the “football” be controlled by a committee rather than by the President.

    “This is gonna be good!” — “Missy” Cooper

    1. Considering that at the time the Constitution and BOR were written, arms included fully armed warships, batteries of artillery, and private armies, I would have to say yes, Trident subs are “arms” and included in the protection of 2A.
      I would imagine that the price would preclude proliferation.

  3. Maybe being a prohibited person, DJT as POTUS will see that major changes in law are made to accommodate non violent offenders from being denied their peacekeepers. Of course he could always hire Kamala to carry the suitcase.
    Hopefully Demoncrap lawfare will open his eyes to the great value of all our God given rights.

Comments are closed.

Verified by MonsterInsights