Because the “in common use” test looks to arms that are in common use today, that test automatically and necessarily protects existing technology, and addresses any contemporary societal concerns stemming from such modern technology. [More]
Note it doesn’t say a word about arms withheld from common use because they’re reserved for the standing army, or future technological developments, which by definition are of exclusive and limited use.
I prefer Mr. Cuccinelli’s assessment.
[Via bondmen]
Should someone invent a practical “phased plasma rifle in the 40 watt range”, and you really, really want one, you will find a way to buy, beg, borrow, steal, or make one.
And so will I and many of our American brothers and sisters.
I’m well aware that makes us a disappointment to our leaders and a challenge to our law enforcement folks. But it is who we are. We’ve been like this at least since the 1700s. Why would we stop now? Why would any sane person expect us to?
They can put their “in common use” and “suitable for sporting purposes” where the sun don’t shine.