DOJ Reconsiders Denial of Documents in Hunter Biden-Related NICS Permanent Entry Consent Suit

Does the DOJ have the power to create new classes of “prohibited persons” outside of what is statutorily defined? [More]

First they said they had no pages. Now they say they have 350. So what’s on those pages, and will any establish they are authorized to redefine”prohibited person” disqualifiers?

Share on Facebook

Save

Author: admin

David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament. View all posts by admin

Shots Fired in Anger December 3, 2024
Special Dispensation December 3, 2024
We’re the Only Ones Subjective Enough December 3, 2024
Beta Testing December 3, 2024
We’re the Only Ones Vigorous Enough December 3, 2024
None Dare Call It Treason December 3, 2024
Mystery to Me December 3, 2024
This Aged Well December 3, 2024
Noisemaker December 3, 2024
Cat Got Their Tongues? December 3, 2024
Schlock Teaser December 3, 2024
Taking the Lead December 2, 2024
Laws for Thee… December 2, 2024
Sowing the Wind December 2, 2024
By All Means, Be Consistent December 2, 2024
Still Shady After All These Years December 2, 2024
Grabbing at Straws December 2, 2024
New Lies for Old December 2, 2024
Is It Safe to Come Out Yet? December 2, 2024
A Fresh Look at History December 2, 2024
Up to Standards December 2, 2024
We’re the Only Ones Road Hogging Enough December 2, 2024
In Their Lane December 2, 2024
We’re the Only Ones Returning Enough December 2, 2024
The Authorized Journalist Protection Act December 2, 2024
Where Kash is King December 2, 2024
Think of It as Plague Insurance December 2, 2024
And They Shall Be Like Gods? December 2, 2024
Do You Come from a Land Down Under? December 2, 2024
That’ll Show Us! December 2, 2024

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Anyone not happy with anything on this site at any time will get 100% of all money they paid to me refunded, no questions asked. (No gratuities solicited or accepted.)

Comment House Rules

Keep them on topic. Trying to hijack threads really grinds my gears. No spam.
I moderate them so I’ll get to them when I can.
No threats against anyone except me. No fights–this is my place and if things get ugly, I treat unruly visitors the same way as I would in my home. Do not feed trolls–I’ll take out the trash.
Try to keep it clean.
I’m the final arbiter. If you don’t like the rules, start your own damn blog.

WarOnGuns Correspondents

Story tips received via email and social media messages will be credited. Just let me know how you want to be recognized (real name, first name/last initial, or screen name.)

Link Policy

I maintained a WogRoll at the old Blogspot place predicated on reciprocity with like-minded RKBA-related sites. Truth be told, I never got much in terms of site visits to make the effort worth the time. I may try to do something again in the future, but for now, my hands are more than full trying to get a new site started.

Advertising Disclosure

This is a placeholder for now because I have not done ads on the old blog for years. In case I ever start them up here, this will be the policy in effect: The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don’t think we’re getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you’re stupid, too. I have had a few ads on the old site in the past and may do so again if I think it’s worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn’t buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don’t mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now–you’re not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer without complete disclosure.

About “The Only Ones”

So named from a comment by DEA agent Lee Paige, who told a classroom full of kids he was “the only one” qualified to be armed and then promptly shot himself in the foot, the purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it’s also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank, or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they’re involved in gun-related incidents.