Maybe It’s Not the Guns?

A California man was found with 1 million rounds of ammo and 248 illegally owned guns in his house, state authorities say [More]

You gotta wonder how they found out.

No one is pointing out how with all that firepower, his guns didn’t kill anyone.

How is that possible?

[Via bondmen]

facebookShare on Facebook
TwitterTweet
FollowFollow us
PinterestSave

Author: admin

David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

6 thoughts on “Maybe It’s Not the Guns?”

  1. I’m sure he followed all safe storage procedures, hense these weapons could not be a threat. This may be sarcasm.

  2. The good question is how and where did he obtain all these weapons. Looks like from the photos that some of them are Class III weapons. Then, we need to ask where were they going?

  4. While looking for something else on Mike’s old website (http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/), I came across a comment which said essentially that a certain group of Americans owned an estimated 350 million firearms and untold billions of rounds of ammo and suggested that if they constituted an active threat to anyone it certainly would have become obvious to everyone by now.

    I can tell you that I have guns. I can’t tell you how many ‘cuz I’d have to take them all out and count them and it just ain’t worth the trouble to satisfy my curiosity, or anyone else’s. I just know I have more than I need but not as many as I want. (A Mauser C96 “Red 9” or “Bolo” and/or an M97 “trench gun” sure would be nice additions). And I have at least 1,000 rounds of ammo for each. IOW, I have enough for some fool to call it an “arsenal”, call me a threat to something or other, and finally get me the 15 minutes of fame I’m supposed to get someday. But would any of that be true?

    In the words of “Taj Mahal” it “ain’t nobody’s business but my own.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trcb0LZfuZA

    https://genius.com/Taj-mahal-nobodys-business-but-my-own-lyrics

  5. I got the impression from some article that he had been a legal collector. The only thing that made them “illegal” was that somebody filed a Red Flag on him. Possibly the wife’s divorce lawyer? If he had the money to (at the time) legally purchase all of that, then a million rounds would be nothing to a machine gun collector.

    1. Are you allowed to possess full auto in CA if you’re not an “Only One”? Per NRA-ILA:

      Machine Guns and Other Firearms
      A machine gun is defined as any firearm, which shoots, or is designed to shoot, automatically, more than one shot, without manual reloading, by single function of the trigger. The term also includes any conversion part, frame or receiver of a machine gun, or any firearm deemed as such by the federal government. Upon a showing of good cause, a permit for possession and/or transportation may be issued by the Department of Justice. It has been reported that the Department of Justice refuses to grant such permits.

Comments are closed.

Verified by MonsterInsights