Next Generation Army Rifle Highlights Danger of ‘Common Use’ Argument to Defend 2nd Amendment

And the prohibitionists are aided in citizen disarmament when “gun rights leaders” not only accept – but argue for an invented “in common use at the time” qualifier that limits permitted firearms to what is commercially popular, as opposed to what soldiers and police carry… [More]

Hitler envisioned a Thousand Year Reich. The goal in the evil minds of fascist gun banners is a totalitarian monopoly of violence—forever.

Author: admin

David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

4 thoughts on “Next Generation Army Rifle Highlights Danger of ‘Common Use’ Argument to Defend 2nd Amendment”

  1. The police are civilians, paid for & equipped by their fellow civilians. At a minimum, whatever they can have, we should have.

  2. The second amendment doesn’t mention cannons, or ducks, or contain the phrase “in common use.”

    Those are all distractions created by RKBA’s enemies and/or apologists.

    Our job is to point out the distractions, and not fall for them ourselves.

      1. TYVM for the hat-tip, and the official threeper membership card. I shall cherish it always.

Comments are closed.

Verified by MonsterInsights