Understand that when Codrea writes “heavily redacted,” what that means is that there’s absolutely nothing of use here. They sent pages of almost nothing but black bars. [More]
Good write-up! I typically like Tom Knighton’s stuff. But why do you think the site added an “Editor’s Note” at the end?
I’m glad to see Bearing Arms is picking up on my stuff more. (I’m going to be working on my response to Cam Edwards later this week.)
Feel free to not publish this, but why is Bearing Arms getting into religious controversy?
Example: https://bearingarms.com/videos/2026/03/31/the-attack-on-biblical-truth-in-american-schools-n1232063
What the duck does this have to do with the 2nd Amendment?
Newsflash for the people at Bearing Arms and their owner, a group that I call “Clown Hell”:
A growing number of patriotic Americans are atheist or agnostic, especially those of us who work(ed) in engineering. I consider myself a believer, but at one time I was a militant atheist, and I still have connections to that community. They might be surprised at how many of us are veterans who were proud to serve back in the day.
I was also “triggered” by their anti-abortion article recently. I just sent another 4 figure check to Planned Parenthood…
Apologies for the rant, Mr. Codrea, but I don’t see the relevance of that article to the firearms controversy. Immigration does, given that most hispanic and oriental(including indians) are virulently anti-gun.
Regards,
The Plague Monk
Your comment is very relevant to because Bearing Arms posted an article by Ranjit Singh arguing against my ocntention that immigration is a “single issue”-relevant topic.
They add that editor’s note (and money beg) at the end of most or all of their articles. It’s just that juxtaposed with this particular article, it’s hilarious.