birthright citizenship - The War on Guns

To Themselves and Their Posterity

The Chinese Billionaires Having Dozens of U.S.-Born Babies Via Surrogate – Videogame executive Xu Bo, said to have more than 100 children, and other elites build mega-families, testing citizenship laws and drawing on nannies, IVF and legal firms set up to help them [More]

No moves by Democrats to change “birthright citizenship” law? What more proof is need that this is the Party of Treason?

Anybody making sure SCOTUS gets this for their consideration?

Thank You, Mr. President

Lawyers for President Donald Trump asked the Supreme Court last week to review the legality of his executive order ending birthright citizenship — a high-profile and controversial order that, if enacted, would have profound impacts on the lives of millions of Americans and lawful U.S. residents. [More]

THIS!

As a nation and a people, it’s the most existentially important battle to win at this time, and this is the only president in my lifetime willing and positioned to wage it.

See? I can say nice things about him when he deserves it.

Now, someone want to clue in the “single issue” monkeys…?

Birth of a Nation

In both instances, a grant of citizenship was not seen as necessary when the person had no political allegiance to America, according to Swearer. [More]

Nice to see her being right.

[Via Michael G]

To Themselves and Their Posterity

Sensible Birthright Citizenship [More]

I’ll go along with #1.

And further think admitting anyone “legally” and naturalizing them should only be done if it helps “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.”

I understand children aren’t responsible for the decisions of their parents.

Neither are we.

[Via Michael G]

Birth of a Nation

Revisiting the Scope of Birthright Citizenship [More]

Good thing this has nothing to do with that “single issue.” And I have that on good authority.

A Matter of Standing

WE CAN USE ANTI-GUN TRICKS AGAINST THE LEFT TO END BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP – Anti-gunners use “standing” arguments against the 2nd Amendment. Now it’s time for us to use them against the left. [Watch]

Yeah, do it, but I’d actually be more interested in overturning precedents that ruled the people have no stake in infringements.

[Via Jess]

Xth Times a Charm?

Act to Support Trump, End Birthright Citizenship for Illegal Aliens Filed by Texas Congressman [More]

How many times is this now…?

Funny, how all the states objecting just confirm what I’ve been saying about “immigration” and guns…

[Via bondmen]

There’s a New Sheriff In Town

Trump to suspend security clearances of 51 intelligence officials who falsely implied Hunter Biden laptop was Russian fake [More]

Conspiracry, collusion, election interference…

[Via Michael G]

And then there’s:

Trump will announce end of birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants [More]

I expect this one will be tied up in courts a while.

HOW THINGS WORK AROUND HERE

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Anyone not happy with anything on this site at any time will get 100% of all money they paid to me refunded, no questions asked. (No gratuities solicited or accepted.)

Comment House Rules

Keep them on topic. Trying to hijack threads really grinds my gears. No spam.
I moderate them so I’ll get to them when I can.
No threats against anyone except me. No fights–this is my place and if things get ugly, I treat unruly visitors the same way as I would in my home. Do not feed trolls–I’ll take out the trash.
Try to keep it clean.
I’m the final arbiter. If you don’t like the rules, start your own damn blog.

WarOnGuns Correspondents

Story tips received via email and social media messages will be credited. Just let me know how you want to be recognized (real name, first name/last initial, or screen name.)

Link Policy

I maintained a WogRoll at the old Blogspot place predicated on reciprocity with like-minded RKBA-related sites. Truth be told, I never got much in terms of site visits to make the effort worth the time. I may try to do something again in the future, but for now, my hands are more than full trying to get a new site started.

Advertising Disclosure

This is a placeholder for now because I have not done ads on the old blog for years. In case I ever start them up here, this will be the policy in effect: The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don’t think we’re getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you’re stupid, too. I have had a few ads on the old site in the past and may do so again if I think it’s worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn’t buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don’t mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now–you’re not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer without complete disclosure.

About “The Only Ones”

So named from a comment by DEA agent Lee Paige, who told a classroom full of kids he was “the only one” qualified to be armed and then promptly shot himself in the foot, the purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it’s also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank, or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they’re involved in gun-related incidents.