Tag: birthright citizenship

Banks Shot

Sen. Jim Banks will introduce legislation Monday aimed at ending birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants and birth tourists by defining them as children of “invaders” under federal law after a Supreme Court ruling last month dealt a setback to President Donald Trump’s executive order on the issue. [More]

Who wants to be that when its introduction is recorded its prognosis for being enacted will be more than 0%?

If At First You Don’t Succeed…?

President Trump Petitioning SCOTUS To Rehear Birthright Citizenship Case [More]

With nothing different? But “U.S. Rep. Brian Babin (R–Woodville) introduced a bill in December 2025 to clarify the interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment”…?

Prognosis 0% chance of being enacted

It gets old.

[Via Sweet Babboo]

No ‘Loony Heritage Americans’ Need Apply

XBOX CEO Asha Sharma cited the company’s financial health for the layoffs. [More]

And if we can’t believe a financially-incentivized “Indian origin” corporate mouthpiece on this, who can we believe?

But wait! There’s more!

Sharma has been asked to be an advisor to the US Federal Reserve for Productivity and Jobs, where she will seemingly lead a task force related to, ironically, employment.

And the administration can’t do that for other issues because…?

It’s a big क्लब and you ain’t in it.

The Usual Suspects

ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, BARRETT, and JACKSON, JJ., joined. JACKSON, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which SOTOMAYOR, J., joined as to the introduction and Part I. KAVANAUGH, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment and dissenting in part. THOMAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which GORSUCH, J., joined. ALITO, J., and GORSUCH, J., filed dissenting opinions. [More]

So, “birthright citizenship” it is.

So much for job interviews that aren’t allowed to ask the right questions.

Enemy, Foreign and Domestic

Careful there, guys. Stephen’s gonna block you.

Shri’s also against guns, demands abolishing ICE, does the “No Kings” crap, and is an all around commie subversive. Who thinks his next generation’s gonna come around? Ranjit? Kostas…?

Some thoughts on “birthright citizenship” using the Bruen standard:

  • Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black described Rep. John Bingham as “The Fourteenth Amendment’s James Madison.”
  • During ratification debates on the Fourteenth Amendment “Bingham argued that birthright citizenship should only extend to children born within the U.S. whose parents did not owe “allegiance to any foreign sovereignty.”
  • You can’t be said to OWE allegiance to this country until you take the oath and are granted citizenship. And by default, newborns are incapable of forming allegiances or incurring debts.

Juan Q. Public

President Trump’s executive order denying birthright citizenship to U.S.-born children of nonresident aliens goes before the Supreme Court Wednesday, and conventional wisdom has it that the president will lose in Trump v. Barbara. If the court stays true to the original meaning of the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause, however, the conventional wisdom will prove wrong. [More]

That’s a big “if.”

[Via Michael G]

None Dare Call It Treason

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes joined her fellow Democratic attorneys general from 22 other states and the District of Columbia in filing an amicus brief in support of birthright citizenship. [More]

Of course they do:

A plan comes together and deliberately indifferent “gun groups” are letting it.

To Themselves and Their Posterity

The Chinese Billionaires Having Dozens of U.S.-Born Babies Via Surrogate – Videogame executive Xu Bo, said to have more than 100 children, and other elites build mega-families, testing citizenship laws and drawing on nannies, IVF and legal firms set up to help them [More]

No moves by Democrats to change “birthright citizenship” law? What more proof is need that this is the Party of Treason?

Anybody making sure SCOTUS gets this for their consideration?

Thank You, Mr. President

Lawyers for President Donald Trump asked the Supreme Court last week to review the legality of his executive order ending birthright citizenship — a high-profile and controversial order that, if enacted, would have profound impacts on the lives of millions of Americans and lawful U.S. residents. [More]

THIS!

As a nation and a people, it’s the most existentially important battle to win at this time, and this is the only president in my lifetime willing and positioned to wage it.

See? I can say nice things about him when he deserves it.

Now, someone want to clue in the “single issue” monkeys…?

To Themselves and Their Posterity

Sensible Birthright Citizenship [More]

I’ll go along with #1.

And further think admitting anyone “legally” and naturalizing them should only be done if it helps “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.”

I understand children aren’t responsible for the decisions of their parents.

Neither are we.

[Via Michael G]

A Matter of Standing

WE CAN USE ANTI-GUN TRICKS AGAINST THE LEFT TO END BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP – Anti-gunners use “standing” arguments against the 2nd Amendment. Now it’s time for us to use them against the left. [Watch]

Yeah, do it, but I’d actually be more interested in overturning precedents that ruled the people have no stake in infringements.

[Via Jess]