False Alternatives

Gun rights! Public safety! Gun rights! Public safety! [Watch]

There’s no tension between the two. They’re both the same side. And coming closer together to “escape” only means we surrender more increments while they make disingenuous noises about easing up on things of ours that they have no claim to.

Talk about a trap.

There is no “debate.” There is truth and there is falsehood, and the latter should never be credited with equal weight or value. 

And TED Talks themselves are for herding sheep.

Not that this useful idiot and the low information dolts who would fall for this childish ploy can figure that out, which suits the evil minds encouraging this misdirection just fine.

Yamane’s “full spectrum” includes Rob Pincus as representative of the hard core gun advocacy side? Funny, how the “compromise” being lauded never questioned where in the Constitution any branch of government is delegated the power to require federal licensing of firearms dealers in the first place. The sides we’re told are opposite were simply quibbling over the degree of ingringement.

But go ahead and take “expert” gun advice from someone who just admitted to the world he pulled the trigger on a .50 cal knowing he couldn’t see his target.

Be honest, Yamane. Tell us who you voted for so we can see what you enable.

[Via Andy M]

Bridging the Divide on Guns a Bridge to Nowhere

Their “Diverse Coalition of Gun Rights and Gun Violence Prevention Advocates” includes rabid prohibitionist zealots who have made careers out of trying to eviscerate the Second Amendment through lawfare and gun bans, with not one recognized “no compromise” member. [More]

Oh, look, another covertly-funded AstroTurf group comprised of useful idiots and rabid prohibitionists trying to lure in low information gun owners who haven’t seen this game before. By “compromise,” they mean you do it.

The Bridge to Nowhere

‘Bridging the Divide’ on Firearms Laws [More]

Oh, look, kinder, gentler gun control couched as a meeting of reasonable minds. Where have we seen that before? And before that?

And when we no longer have to expend resources on these, we can focus on our next steps toward the goal.

If these rights swindlers wanted to attract more gun owners, they’d be stumping for BIDS– and not doing so reveals the fraud behind “background checks.”

Figures, Rob Pincus is part of it...

Verified by MonsterInsights