impeachment - The War on Guns

She Wins a Kewpie Doll!

Justice Jackson says attacks on judges, including impeachment calls, are ‘designed to intimidate’ [More]

Yeah, no $#!+.

Because if you can’t be, then you become unaccountable.

Why do you think that Second Amendment you keep voting against is still working well enough to discourage mass confiscations?

And Now, the Rest of the Story

Remember Shri?

Turns out he’s got incentive$.

[Via WiscoDave]

Enemy, Foreign AND Domestic

Indian-Born Democrat Congressman Introduces SEVEN Articles of Impeachment Against President Trump [More]

Of course, he’s a gun-grabber.

If he and his folks don’t like it here, they can always go back, no? Except Trump and Elon want to bring in more. Despite the pre-election numbers showing that “Sixty-one percent of registered Indian American voter respondents plan to vote for Harris while 32 percent intend to vote for Trump..”

And yes, I acknowledge there are patriots of foreign heritage who are the exception. Immigration policy needs to be a filter to screen out applicants who are not coming in to help “secure the Blessings of Liberty.”

Much Ado About Nothing

Articles of impeachment, accusing her of high crimes and misdemeanors, have been filed in Congress by U.S. Rep. Andy Ogles, R-Tenn., against Kamala Harris, the current vice present and, since Joe Biden’s exit from the race, the presumed Democrat party nominee for president. [More]

Meh:

Prognosis 14% chance of being agreed to.

People Who Live in Thatched Bohios Shouldn’t Throw Molotov Cocktails

Ocasio-Cortez Introduces Articles of Impeachment Against Justice Thomas and Justice Alito [More]

Prognosis:

4% chance of being agreed to

For both.

Speaking of “impermissible gifts“…

[Via Jess]

Sleight of Mind

Chuck Schumer Says ‘Impeachment Should Never be Used to Settle Policy Disagreements’ [More]

While everyone is focused on his hypocrisy, the bigger lie getting less notice is that invasion-facilitating treason is a “policy disagreement.”

Always be mindful of red herrings and wrong questions.

[Via Michael G]

HOW THINGS WORK AROUND HERE

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Anyone not happy with anything on this site at any time will get 100% of all money they paid to me refunded, no questions asked. (No gratuities solicited or accepted.)

Comment House Rules

Keep them on topic. Trying to hijack threads really grinds my gears. No spam.
I moderate them so I’ll get to them when I can.
No threats against anyone except me. No fights–this is my place and if things get ugly, I treat unruly visitors the same way as I would in my home. Do not feed trolls–I’ll take out the trash.
Try to keep it clean.
I’m the final arbiter. If you don’t like the rules, start your own damn blog.

WarOnGuns Correspondents

Story tips received via email and social media messages will be credited. Just let me know how you want to be recognized (real name, first name/last initial, or screen name.)

Link Policy

I maintained a WogRoll at the old Blogspot place predicated on reciprocity with like-minded RKBA-related sites. Truth be told, I never got much in terms of site visits to make the effort worth the time. I may try to do something again in the future, but for now, my hands are more than full trying to get a new site started.

Advertising Disclosure

This is a placeholder for now because I have not done ads on the old blog for years. In case I ever start them up here, this will be the policy in effect: The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don’t think we’re getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you’re stupid, too. I have had a few ads on the old site in the past and may do so again if I think it’s worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn’t buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don’t mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now–you’re not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer without complete disclosure.

About “The Only Ones”

So named from a comment by DEA agent Lee Paige, who told a classroom full of kids he was “the only one” qualified to be armed and then promptly shot himself in the foot, the purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it’s also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank, or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they’re involved in gun-related incidents.