Legally armed civilians, we’re told, pose a major danger. They shoot innocent bystanders, justifiably kill others whenever they personally believe “force is reasonably necessary,” and rely on racist self-defense laws. [More]
One question: Why do they refer to violence monopoly propaganda apparatchik Mark Maremont as a “reporter”?
And as per the playbook of resurrecting old scare tactics that didn’t work the first time, such bleating isn’t even original.
I just got a subscription solicitation in the mail from WSJ. They get the same reply FOP did.
[Via bondmen]
