“He said the intent behind his bill was to stop the sale of nitrous oxide canisters”
In other words, he worded his own bill incompetently, and now has to be “interpreted” out of the hole he dug.
Just like the geniuses behind 18 USC 924(c)(1), “use/carry of a gun in relation to a drug trafficking crime,” where mere ownership of an unloaded, locked-away gun in a residence or car trunk was deemed to qualify.
Apparently, the law has been misinterpreted. By pretty much every story I saw.
https://www.thecentersquare.com/new_york/yes-new-yorkers-it-is-legal-to-buy-whipped-cream/article_c90fdda4-289c-11ed-a39d-0f6aeb00c1be.html
“He said the intent behind his bill was to stop the sale of nitrous oxide canisters”
In other words, he worded his own bill incompetently, and now has to be “interpreted” out of the hole he dug.
Just like the geniuses behind 18 USC 924(c)(1), “use/carry of a gun in relation to a drug trafficking crime,” where mere ownership of an unloaded, locked-away gun in a residence or car trunk was deemed to qualify.