Stealing It Right in Front of Us

Judge Allows Juror Who ‘Celebrated Trump’s Loss in 2020’ to Stay in Pool [More]

Does anyone really believe this is anything but a partisan plot to let Democrats steal the election because they’re pretty sure that “greatest threat” is too disorganized and perceives it has too much to lose by going kinetic?

[Via bondmen]

Scofflaw Gets a Pass

Cops Seize E Jean Carroll’s Unregistered Gun After National Pulse Report. [More]

No outrage over this deliberate lawbreaking from her fellow Democrats…?

Not even a mention from any of the gungrab groups on their X feeds for this blatant violation of one of their keystone objectives…?

[Via Jess]

Think of It as Good Old-Fashioned Bench Electioneering

US Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to put on hold a New York City licensing rule requiring prospective gun owners to show good moral character to own a firearm. In rejecting a stay request on Thursday relating to a district court order that’s being appealed, Sotomayor turned away yet another bid to prohibit government officials from enforcing their laws while being challenged in court. [More]

Sounds to me like she’s campaigning to keep her seat.

Related UPDATE

Yes, by all means.

[Via Jess]

FOIA Request Questions FBI for Using NICS on NY Ammunition Background Checks

Can NICS be used for purposes for which it is not federally authorized? [More]

It makes fair the question “What else could the prohibitonists use it for?”

Gotta Serve Somebody

The two letters show opposite assumptions about reality and the role of governments. The NY letter assumes guns are bad, and ordinary citizens should not have guns, because ordinary citizens do bad things with guns. The letter from the 28 states assumes government is subordinate to the people, government must defend the nation, and an armed population aids the government in defending the nation against all enemies. These two assumptions about reality are in direct conflict. [More]

Like Mike always said:

We are, in fact, two countries divided by the fundamental difference of principle on the question: Does the government serve the people, or do the people serve the government?

We’re the Only Ones Taking Your Breath Away Enough

Man who was ticketed for shouting at police to turn on headlights can sue… R. Anthony Rupp III, a civil rights attorney, said he did not initially intend to sue over the incident, but changed his mind after learning the same officers were involved two months later in the arrest of an unarmed man who died of an asthma attack after struggling while being handcuffed. [More]

Back the blue-faced…?

[Via Michael G]

Reframing Bruen

As described above, the Petitioner has demonstrated and the Court finds that New York’s Red Flag Law is not beyond the “outer limits” the framers and ratifiers of the Second and Fourteenth amendment understood them, based on the nation’s historical traditions. [More]

It’s no surprise support for Red Queen laws comes from judges still inserting an affinity for the “collective right” interpretation into their arguments…

Washington Gun Law gives analysis commentary.

[Via Jess]

One Down…

US District Court judge Glenn Suddaby finds that NY ban on guns in public housing violates the 2nd Amendment. [More]

That’s all fine and good, but I still want to know why forcing me to pay for someone else’s living costs don’t violate the 13th Amendment

I wonder what the text, history, and tradition at the time of ratification would have to say about that…

[Via Jess]

UPDATE

SAF weighs in.

Bolting the Barn Door

New York makes it easier to get an abortion than to adopt a baby thanks in part to Hochul admin edict, critics say [More]

Dealing with the wrong end of this, aren’t we? Who doesn’t know how babies are made?

The rest is just expecting someone else to deal with choices made by others.

You know, the Democrat agenda.

No civilization can endure when such burdens are forced. And that’s kind of the plan…

[Via Michael G]

Gabby’s Favorite Insurrectionist

We are proud to endorse former Congressman @Tom_Suozzi
in the critical special election for NY-03! From helping pass the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act to working to get dangerous weapons off the streets of his community, Congressman Suozzi is a proven leader on gun safety. [More]

Just to be clear: They support a politican disarming you who justified taking up arms against a lawfully elected Donald Trump, the law enforcement and military under his command, and his citizen supporters.

Democrats Offer Anti-Gun Insurrectionist in New York Special Election

And what’s worse is that while Suozzi showed he perfectly understands the ultimate last resort provision against tyranny behind the Second Amendment, he actively works to undermine it in his quest for power over the lives of his countrymen. [More]

Suozzi’s idea of “gun violence prevention” is to disarm you and me and start an armed uprising.

A Not-So Golden Parachute?

The resignation of Wayne LaPierre on the eve of the trial in New York has generated letters to Judge Joel Cohen from both sides. In addition, the pre-trial memorandum containing the NRA’s trial brief seems to throw Wayne under the bus after three plus years of defending him. [More]

A lot more than Wayne will have to end up under those wheels if they ever hope to restore any credibility.

I’m hearing rumors that they may be looking to had the reins over to Lautenberg Bob. If they really want to kill it dead, I can’t think of a better way.

[Via Jess]

They’ll Know It When They See It?

“We recognize that ‘good moral character’ is a spongy concept susceptible to abuse.” [More]

Like the definition of “pornography“? Or “woman“?

I wonder if a Second Amendment advocate who believes it is a bulwark against domestic tyranny could be disqualified…

And if that would be sufficient to bring a libel suit…

Verified by MonsterInsights