Who Better to Heed on Founding Intent?

“When they promised the right to bear arms, they had muskets. So, yeah, everyone should have like equal rights to a musket.” [More]

Been fighting that lie for a minute.

And years.

He, of course, knows better. So do his backers.

That the antis still use it proves they can rely on low information useful idiots to swallow their lies and the truth won’t even reach them, let alone move them. And recent “arrivals” used to the state being the arbiter of what’s permitted will unquestioningly accept it.

That’s a major argument those who counsel “wait a generation or two” don’t want to address.

dcodrea

Author: admin

David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

3 thoughts on “Who Better to Heed on Founding Intent?”

  1. So, following their logic, the First Amendment doesn’t protect TV, motion pictures, the internet. etc?

    IIRC, SCOTUS has already dealt with (Caetano v. Massachusetts and Heller) the idea that the Second Amendment only protects the firearms that Capt. John Parker and his militia unit might have used on April 19, 1775.

  2. Here’s an original thought or two. Lets tax all “bullets” at $500 apiece and make gun owners carry a bazillion dollars of liability insurance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.