Lower courts have misunderstood footnote 9 and expanded the term “shall-issue” to encompass all objective regulations on the purchase, possession, carry, or transfer of firearms… [More]
Sorry, professor.
I realize you’re smarter than me and better educated and everything, but I don’t think for one second activist Democrat judges misunderstand anything. I think they know exactly what they’re doing and are arrogant in the knowledge that there will be no personal repercussions to their judicial tyranny.
Or do I just need to turn up my euphemism meter?
[Via Michael G]
I think you need to retune your sarcasm meter.
“Never has a single footnote in a Supreme Court opinion been so misread by so many lower courts to deny so many Americans their constitutional rights.”
One quick thought on “all a misunderstanding.” Footnote 9 is just another in a long train of infringements of that which “shall not be infringed.”
They can stuff “footnote 9” along with “shall issue.”
While they’re at it they can stuff “in common use” and “sporting purposes” as well.
The professor needs to work on his understanding of “shall not.”