Burden of Proof

Like Ballot Measure 114—which this bill modifies—HB 4145 will put countless Oregonians at risk of jail time if they cannot prove they acquired standard magazines before a date that even the lawyers are not sure of. Keep in mind, no matter what you have been told, it is impossible to prove when you acquired a magazine. Any “affirmative defense” is an illusion. [More]

Sounds like it’s time for some enterprising manufacturer to date stamp mags before then and open a shop across the Idaho border.

Author: admin

David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

One thought on “Burden of Proof”

  1. It is repugnant to me that we should need to prove our innocence in any matter.
    An out-of-state entrepreneur should offer magazine date stamping / laser engraving services for current owners of magazines.
    My preference for AR-15 magazines would be “4/1/50” – April Fool’s Day 1950, well before Eugene Stoner’s AR-10 design for ArmaLite. Another choice would be “12/7/41”, because that is a date that will live on in infamy, or so we are told. Still another choice would be “4/19/75”, which would commemorate the Battle of Lexington and Concord, where Massachusetts Patriot militia forces resisted the confiscation of locally owned military supplies by British Regulars who had marched from Boston.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Verified by MonsterInsights