Category: Codrea’s Law

The Assault Foot and Shopping Cart of War Loophole

Kristin Hartman, 54, is facing charges of disorderly conduct, assault and battery with a dangerous weapon (shod foot), vandalism, assault and battery, assault and battery with a dangerous weapon (shopping cart), driving under the influence of liquor, resisting arrest, and two counts of assault and battery on a police officer. [More]

Some people just can’t be trusted with anything.

[Via Edmund M]

Teenage Wasteland

16-year-old Darien Harris, who was charged as an adult, was sentenced to life in prison with the first eligibility for parole after 20 years. [More]

So it’s not life in prison, is it?

No worries. I’m sure anyone feral, cowardly, and retarded enough to indiscriminately fire into a group who is then immersed for decades in a brutal survival culture with like-minded beasts will be trustworthy again at age 38.

Demand Commonsense Foot Safety Laws!

Staffer at Mass. school dies after assault by student, DA says – Amy Morrell, 53, was kicked in the chest while attempting to restrain a girl trying to leave a dorm building without permission, prosecutors said. [More]

With the scourge of foot violence it’s time we asked ourselves why civilians need assault feet, that is, extremities of war designed to quickly stomp people, and why anyone but police need patrol feet.

Looks like I need to add another trust criterion.

[Via Edmund M]

A New York State of Mind

Repeat Offender With 33 Arrests Kills Brooklyn Church Usher After “Kind” Gesture – His accused killer, a man with 33 arrests, walked free until he met a good man holding a door. And that act of kindness cost an innocent New Yorker his life. [More]

There oughta be a law.

Democrats made sure the guy getting his head repeatedly stomped on was forbiddn by law to defend himself with a gun.

What is it with people holding doors getting murdered by feral retards?

[Via Michael G]

What Will Help?

Anti-Gun Rhetoric Doesn’t Help With Domestic Violence Tragedies [More]

There’s violence in criminal households where “prohibited persons” ignore gun laws? Who knew?

Any room for “Be a better woman so you can chose a better man” in there? How about keeping people who can’t be trusted away from access to guns and to those who can be?

[Via bondmen]

There Oughta Be a Law

A “career criminal” is facing federal charges in Minnesota after he allegedly went on an armed carjacking spree Thursday morning that ended when he slammed a vehicle into another car. Prosecutors said the crash killed two women in their twenties and seriously injured a 6-year-old boy. [More]

45 and still pulling this $#!+… in spite of those prior restraints on you and me.

Those who kept letting him go share culpability.

Tangentially Related:

Decarlos Brown Jr. says “Hold my malt liquor.”

It Just Doesn’t Matter

Minnesota has red flag laws…. But because the killer’s family affirmed his mental illness, there was nothing a gun shop could do. So unless you’re prepared to make transgenderism a diagnosed mental illness, none of that will matter. [More]

Not that red flag laws would stop a determined psycho predator from victimizing others, and the law that would work has zero chance of being enacted.

I’m actually drafting an article about a Democrat school district in California (is there any other kind?) that is taking steps to legally classify objectors as the ones with mental problems. Stay tuned.

[Via Antigone]

Hold That Tiger

There are some behaviors so aberrant, some crimes so vicious, and some consciences so amoral that it can never be safe to allow a congenital predator unfettered access to a potential victim pool and not expect that innocents will be attacked. [More]

My latest American Handgunner “Second Amendment” column is out.

House Upon the Sand

Why Can’t Laura Loomer Own A Gun? I Asked Her Father Jeff, And The FBI [More]

Not taking sides here, just saying this is out there and needs to be factored into credibility assessments. If true, careful relying on her judgments. If untrue, it would seem a massive libel suit is in order.

I’ve never been one for following personalities anyway, regardless of what they profess. Just like ad hominem attacks, it’s a logical fallacy to go the other way, and disappointment in finding feet of clay can be destructive to more than just the icon outed.

Case in point…the principles of Oath Keepers are still valid and needed regardless of what anyone chooses to believe about its founder.

Verified by MonsterInsights