Inclusiveness Writ Large

“These fifty laws identified by the Attorney General constitute a long, embarrassing, disgusting, insidious, reprehensible list of examples of government tyranny towards our own people,” Benitez wrote — and such “repugnant historical examples of prejudice and bigotry will not be used to justify the State’s current infringement on the constitutional rights of citizens.” [More]

Yet that’s exactly what Rob Bonta and all Democrats– not just the California ones — are calling for, no matter how much they try to distance themselves with specious, self-serving excuses.

Using their “logic,” they can also use the whip as long as they do it to all of us.

What do we have a Second Amendment for, again…?

[Via Jess]

Author: admin

David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

One thought on “Inclusiveness Writ Large”

  1. The State provided a spreadsheet of laws they thought analogous. Of the 53 laws from the allowed time period (1791-1888, as set by Judge Benitez), 50 were race codes designed to disarm minorities, 2 were prohibitions on minors, and one governed being armed without cause or while drunk. None of them are relevant or analogous to a prohibition on the general public.

    No, of course the judge is not going to accept them! And that’s the BEST they could come up with!

Comments are closed.

Verified by MonsterInsights