Inclusiveness Writ Large

“These fifty laws identified by the Attorney General constitute a long, embarrassing, disgusting, insidious, reprehensible list of examples of government tyranny towards our own people,” Benitez wrote — and such “repugnant historical examples of prejudice and bigotry will not be used to justify the State’s current infringement on the constitutional rights of citizens.” [More]

Yet that’s exactly what Rob Bonta and all Democrats– not just the California ones — are calling for, no matter how much they try to distance themselves with specious, self-serving excuses.

Using their “logic,” they can also use the whip as long as they do it to all of us.

What do we have a Second Amendment for, again…?

[Via Jess]

dcodrea

Author: admin

David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

One thought on “Inclusiveness Writ Large”

  1. The State provided a spreadsheet of laws they thought analogous. Of the 53 laws from the allowed time period (1791-1888, as set by Judge Benitez), 50 were race codes designed to disarm minorities, 2 were prohibitions on minors, and one governed being armed without cause or while drunk. None of them are relevant or analogous to a prohibition on the general public.

    No, of course the judge is not going to accept them! And that’s the BEST they could come up with!

Comments are closed.