“I told her we prefer ‘gun enthusiast,’” Nagel said. “She said she prefers ‘gun nuts,’ and she works for the ATF?”
Scott found nothing in the shop’s books other than a few minor clerical errors. There were no missing firearms or other significant problems.
“She said she was going to put us in for revocation, and that it may change as it goes up the chain, but that was her recommendation,” Nagel said. [More]
She sounds like a hook-baiter.
Tyranny enforcers haven’t learned a thing since King George “sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people.” I wonder if Republicans don’t blow it in November if House Oversight will subpoena her.
[Via Jess]
https://youtu.be/gb1MVFDy_tw
https://www.brighteon.com/80a21172-44b2-46af-8f7e-2510ed347ecb
THIS IS AN ATF AGENT WHO GETS TASERED; THROWN ON THE GROUND; HANDCUFFED AND ARRESTED.
THIS AGENT TRIED TO SEE AN OWNERS GUNS WITHOUT A WARRANT
IF ATF COME TO YOUR BUSINESS OR HOME – ASK THEM FOR A WARRANT
IF THEY DO NOT HAVE ONE – TELL THEM THEY ARE TRESPASSING AND TO LEAVE
IF THEY DO NOT LEAVE – JUST CLOSE THE DOOR
INVOKE THE 5th AMENDMENT AND TELL THEM YOU ARE NOT GOING TO TALK TO THEM AND CLOSE THE DOOR
THEN……………… CALL THE POLICE AND TELL THEM THAT THERE IS SOMEONE THERE TRYING SEE YOUR GUNS AND THEY ARE IMPERSONATING A POLICE OFFICER
DO NOT DISCUSS ANYTHING ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WITH THE ATF, LAW ENFORCEMENT OR ANY GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL AT YOUR HOME OR ON THE TELEPHONE
This .gov agent will eventually sashay off to a well paid retirement and will never be called to task for her prejudicial remarks. She is apparently proficient at her assigned tasks, maybe employee of the month in terms of revocation numbers?
Arrogance and fealty to the party line can get you a good distance up the ladder of success I guess.
She sounds like a hook-baiter.
DAvid you used a few too many letters to desribe this creature. Try leaving out
-bait. This is far more accurate.