Notes from the Resistance
Heeter v. James Challenges New York Body Armor Ban Under the Second Amendment [More]
Good. They made sure to include historical examples that did the exact opposite of what New York Democrats are imposing. What’s that tell you about these regressive tyrants when their prohibitions are more oppressive than those of medieval monarchies?
This guy got arrested at a Christmas parade in Florida for wearing a body armor vest concealed under his shirt. The problem is, that wasn’t illegal. I saw this in the news, with cops taking a victory lap and Karens rejoicing about it, so I put in a request for the footage, and just got it. And it’s worse than I even thought it would be. Lawful conduct does not become illegal just because police officers – or Karens – are afraid of something. My rights don’t end where your fear of some perfectly legal object begins. [Watch]
Those “citizens” grateful to the “Only Ones” remind me of nothing so much as the sheep bleating for Lambert to save her.
Why would communists be afraid of them?
[Via Andy M]
A federal judge has ruled that a constitutional challenge to New York state’s ban on selling bulletproof vests to civilians can move forward. The ruling by U.S. District Court Judge John Sinatra Jr. rejected a motion from state Attorney General Letitia James and other New York officials to dismiss a challenge, ruling the plaintiffs have standing to sue the state over the restrictions. [More]
“Commonsense gun safety law advocate” Letitia not only wants to disarm you, she wants her shock troops to be able to more easily kill you with their “weapons of war.”
[Via Jess]
It would specifically ban civilian use of armor that meets or exceeds Level 3 ballistic resistance, which protects against rifle ammunition. The proposed legislation only seeks to enforce civilian usage while allowing military and police personnel to use the armor. [More]
The violence monopolists want the state to be able to disarm you and to kill you.
[Via Jess]
Stormy Daniels wore bulletproof vest to get to court over fears of what ‘some nut might do to her’: attorney [More]
So, did she really “teach Kathy Hochul a lesson” or did she prove that if Democrats find you useful they’ll give you a pass on disaramament laws?
[Via Jess]
Army fielding new helmet that protects against small arms fire [More]
Can “We the People” have them, or aren’t they “in common use“?
[Via WiscoDave]
Opinion: California body armor ban will not stop mass shootings [More]
So Damon Connolly achieving his grand purpose in life will serve who, then?
There’s a quote from me in there. Here’s my complete response.
Marin assemblyman’s bill would ban body armor sales for most Californians [More]
Because it’s Damon Connolly’s grand purpose in life to tell you what he will allow you to have, and especially what he won’t.
[Via Jess]
