Dick's - The War on Guns

Committed to Remaining Dick’s

Former Dick’s Sporting Goods CEO defends stance on gun restrictions despite backlash [More]

I’m surprised no stockholders sued over his admitting his virtue signaling cost the company a quarter billion dollars…

Their stock performance over 5 years tells me most gun owners don’t care.

Go Woke…

Dick’s Sporting Goods blames equity … SORRY … ‘organized retail crime’ for MASSIVE drop in profits [More]

Funny, they didn’t say a word about this the other day… About those new locations– I wonder if they’ve put them in areas where DEI is “underrepresented.”

I also wonder if they had similar floor loss problems when gun owner business was a thing for them…

[Via Michael G]

House of Dicks

DICK’S Sporting Goods (NYSE: DKS) has continued to expand the House of Sport brand as nine new locations celebrated their grand openings in July and August. These locations join the first three House of Sport stores in Victor, New York; Knoxville, Tennessee; and Minnetonka, Minnesota. [More]

So none of their customers own guns?

Or are the ones who do just further proof that “Gun Culture 2.0” is no reason for gushing “gun influencers” to sound so damn triumphant and instead enable the spread of 97percent subversion?

[Via Michael G]

Sweating the Mall Stuff

On Saturday, June 17 Springfield Police responded to white Oaks Mall, near Dicks Sporting Goods for a report of shots fired. [More]

I was half-expecting to read a Fudd dumb enough to still shop there had a negligent discharge.

And now I’m wondering if WAND practices AP racist capitalization.

[Via Steve T]

Not This Time, Fellas

Photos from the scene shared on social media showed a large law enforcement presence outside a Dick’s Sporting Goods store. [More]

And you know what Dick’s — with its management decision on what not to sell — couldn’t do for cops that B&B Sales could do a quarter century ago in the North Hollywood shootout?

Another Result of Carelessly Stimulating Dick’s

Dick’s Sporting Goods will reimburse employees traveling for abortions [More]

So if you’re a gun owner who still patronizes them, you’re not only giving aid and comfort to the enemy, you’re enabling this as well.

[Via Mack H]

Your Reward for Patronage

250 CEOs, Including Levi’s and Dick’s Sporting Goods Execs, Demand ‘Immediate Action’ on Gun Control [More]

Gun owners have had plenty of reasons not to give aid and comfort to enemy corporations Dick’s and Levi over the years. If you still do, you own undermining those fighting citizen disarmament.

And please, nobody say “Wrangler.”

HOW THINGS WORK AROUND HERE

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Anyone not happy with anything on this site at any time will get 100% of all money they paid to me refunded, no questions asked. (No gratuities solicited or accepted.)

Comment House Rules

Keep them on topic. Trying to hijack threads really grinds my gears. No spam.
I moderate them so I’ll get to them when I can.
No threats against anyone except me. No fights–this is my place and if things get ugly, I treat unruly visitors the same way as I would in my home. Do not feed trolls–I’ll take out the trash.
Try to keep it clean.
I’m the final arbiter. If you don’t like the rules, start your own damn blog.

WarOnGuns Correspondents

Story tips received via email and social media messages will be credited. Just let me know how you want to be recognized (real name, first name/last initial, or screen name.)

Link Policy

I maintained a WogRoll at the old Blogspot place predicated on reciprocity with like-minded RKBA-related sites. Truth be told, I never got much in terms of site visits to make the effort worth the time. I may try to do something again in the future, but for now, my hands are more than full trying to get a new site started.

Advertising Disclosure

This is a placeholder for now because I have not done ads on the old blog for years. In case I ever start them up here, this will be the policy in effect: The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don’t think we’re getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you’re stupid, too. I have had a few ads on the old site in the past and may do so again if I think it’s worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn’t buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don’t mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now–you’re not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer without complete disclosure.

About “The Only Ones”

So named from a comment by DEA agent Lee Paige, who told a classroom full of kids he was “the only one” qualified to be armed and then promptly shot himself in the foot, the purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it’s also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank, or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they’re involved in gun-related incidents.