Switching Over

Fifth Circuit Rules Federal Switchblade Restrictions Violate Second Amendment. The court concluded that such knives qualify as “arms” under the Second Amendment. [More]

I’m wondering what the hell Todd Blanche was doing defending it based on “historic tradition.”

The antis use obscure edicts to argue infringements are OK but you’ll note the cases they cite weren’t challenged on 2A grounds and ruled on by SCOTUS. I’d expect our “pro-2A” DOJ to understand that.

[Via Sweet Babboo]

FA sans FO

VanDyke argued the 9th Circuit has spent years resisting Supreme Court precedent recognizing robust Second Amendment protections, asserting that decisions in District of Columbia v. Heller and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen have “changed nothing” in the circuit’s approach to gun-rights cases. He contended the court continues to find new doctrinal paths to uphold firearm restrictions. [More]

Since SCOTUS summary reversals of defiant inferior court decisions have not been forthcoming, it sounds like the person who needs to be publicly slapped is John Roberts.